I would say learn how to play with these variables. You know, at the beginning of this episode we had mentioned and we had talked about how learning how to water the plants is one of the most difficult things that you can do as a grower, and it really takes the longest amount of time. I mean, it's the simplest thing, because it's the first thing you have to do in order to grow a plant, but it's the very last thing that you actually end up figuring out and dialing in. So I think the reason that it takes people a long time to figure out how to water is because they don't understand this soil, plant, air continuum. They don't understand Spock, right? They just need to understand Spock a little bit better, because then everything will make sense. I feel like that's the quantum wormhole for people. Once you understand Spock, you will understand VPD, and you will understand how to learn the optimum way of watering your plants. Oh, let me put it to you this way, if you understand Spock, and let's just say hypothetically, you over water your plants. If you understand Spock, the first thing you're going to do is crank that humidity down and turn the light intensity up just a little bit. Or hypothetically, on the reverse end of the equation, let's say you underwater your plants, and you're concerned that they're going to get too dry too fast. What would you go in and do? You would go in and raise the humidity, allow the air to get wetter, create a little back pressure on the plants? Not a big deal, as long as it doesn't actually slow down metabolism. Plants are very plastic. They have ranges that are optimum for them. They don't have any one distinct number or any precise thing that is accurate, that will always work out best for them. It's always a combination of variables, and the optimum is really just a range. It's a sweet spot. So I love that. Being said, your plants will hang out in an optimum spot if you can learn how to work with them, if you underwater them, you can maybe turn the humidity up a little bit and let the air get wetter, and you don't have to worry so much about light intensity either. That way your plants burn through that moisture a little bit slower, but you're not kicking them out of the equilibrium. The equilibrium is maintained between the pressure differences that are created in the soil being negative, much higher pressure versus in the air being positive and much lower pressure. Those two exist in conjunction in an equilibrium with each other, and that equilibrium has a massive, massive range, if you understand it properly. So I hope people will take that to heart and kind of start, start playing around a little bit and understanding that it's really just the soil, plant, air continuum thing that matters way more than VPD. And as we looked at already VPD is, you know, just VPD by itself is missing a third and very, very important variable, which is the light intensity and light quality. VPD is useless without measuring light intensity and light quality. So why don't we see that third variable there as a cross section of temperature and humidity? The other thing that I want to point out real quick, because I had this come up a couple of times in my head so far, and I don't want to miss out on this thought relative humidity. I don't think people should focus on a percentage of relative humidity as being the important thing. I think when you're measuring humidity, the important thing to do is figure out how much water you're removing. What is the volume of water you're removing? Because if I set let's say I have two rooms that are identical in terms of their percentage humidity. Let's say I'm in week six of flower, 78 degrees. I want those plants to be at 40% relative humidity. So if I just look at the percentage humidity in both rooms, I'll see it set to 40% and that might give me the indication that both rooms are performing exactly the same. I mean, why wouldn't they be right? The humidity is set to the same percentage, but the actual variable that's important to measure is how much water is being pulled out to maintain that 40% humidity. Let's say, in one of those rooms I have a 320 pint dehumidifier, but in the other room I have 5000 pints of dehumidification, right? The 5000 pints of dehumidification, staying at 40% humidity is gonna let me water those plants 10 times as much, right? And if I'm watering plants 10 times as much, and they're going through wet dry cycles either 10 times as fast or 10 times more efficiently. I'm getting 10 times more productivity out of a room that's also set to 40% relative humidity, just like the other one is. It's not about the percentage humidity, it's about how much moisture did you pull out? It seems to