4:32PM Nov 6, 2020
Okay, I'm gonna try this way instead.
I got some nice plants in the background there
just a small part of my collection.
They keep me entertained. All right,
Yeah. Is that okay? Yeah.
Perfect. Hi everyone, by the way, you
just to our online guests who have already joined us we'll be starting the event in a couple of minutes. Thank you.
The report books are actually it's a little bit more raised.
Make the panelists to where we are now streaming live on Facebook.
Actually, I should probably tweet out this event. Just before it's starting. You're gonna do a tweet rockin or have you done one? Yes, yes.
So ladies and gentlemen, thank you for joining us for tonight's event is the left losing British Indians, which I feel is a very interesting question, but also one which is under discussed when you're looking specifically at the Labour Party. In the last general election, it provided its worst performance since 1935. much discussion, understandably, has been on labor losses in traditional industrial heartland, Northern England, the provincial Midlands, and also parts of Wales. But there is also evidence that labour fell some way behind among British Indian voters. And that's definitely seen in sharp drops in the Leicester constituencies. Also in parts of West London, especially the higher East constituency. So some of the questions we'll be considering tonight is what is driving the this loosening, you could save this relationship between the British political left and British Indian voters? What kind of repair work can be done in order to rebuild ties? or indeed has so much damage been done? Does it present an opportunity for the Conservative Party to become the natural party of British Indians? Very happy that I've managed to put together such a wonderful panel for tonight's event. So before we get into everything, I just like to make a few short introductions. Firstly, we have soon that McCarney who is currently a solicitor the independent office for police conduct. He is a former city councilor and parliamentary candidate in his home of Leicester and serve the Labour Party for 20 years before he resigned from the party, saying that the party was institutionally racist, and an anti Indian party that was against the interests of the working people. You don't mince your words and put it that way. We also have sunny hundal Ward winning writer and journalist has founded websites such as liberal democracy Barfi culture and Asians in media has been reporting on South Asian communities for 20 years now. One One could call him they even though his youthful looks, he's very much a veteran in the game, I would say. And he has written for the times financial times the independent Guardian, CNN, Al Jazeera, and I'll stop there. So I won't bore people any further. And last but not least, we have Satya Hamid so they made is a multi award winning human rights advocate. And she has been very active force in the women's sector for the past decade, especially when it comes to combating harmful traditional practices. She is winner of the Iranian and Kurdish women's rights organization activist of the Year Award, and the lift effect Star Award. And she's the founder and co founder of note the founder and co director of four freedoms, and she's also the director of Gloucestershire sisters, where she does some wonderful work in terms of combating these harmful traditional practices. So firstly, I'd like to invite sandip to open up this event. So send them I'd be quite interesting to hear more about your personal experience. Now, as I've mentioned, you served the Labour Party for 20 years, and then you resigned, what were the reasons behind that?
Thank you, Rocky, thank you, to the Henry Jackson society for organizing the event. And it's a pleasure to be here with Sonny and Sonia, both of whom I greatly respect. I thank you for inviting me tonight. So, yes, interesting political times. And I'm very happy to go into all of this as you've just proved. Ricky, Thanks for the introduction. As you said, I served 20 years as a Labour Party member and activist and also, for some years as a labour politician. I served in total, six years as a constituency officer for years as a city councilor, and Lester. I served on the Leicestershire police authority, also as a parliamentary candidate in 2015, as a council candidate in 2018. And for four years, I lead a national branch of the trade union. So I think I've earned my spurs in the Labour Party. And certainly I think I've also earned the right to say what I've been seeing in regards to my perception and my experiences, as I said a moment ago, interesting political times, and not just because of what's happening across the Atlantic. But we're together tonight, just a week on from a determination by the equalities and Human Rights Commission, which found that the Labour Party is institutionally racist in regards to anti semitism. And that was a finding in law. So the question is no longer is the party institutionally racist. That's been answered. The question is, to what extent is it institutionally racist and how how bad is the rot? How deep is the rot? I quit the Labour Party on the 15th of August on Indian Independence Day, I thought the symbolism matters. And I published an article A week later, setting out my reasons for doing so which I'll go into. But it's true to say that this is not a new phenomenon. I, for example, were sounding the alarm some 10 years ago, when I wrote an article about how the Labour Party was using the Hindu vote, the Indian vote, and more generally, but the party over the years didn't choose to listen to those of us who were sounding the alarm. So first of all, let me talk about examples of what we're dealing with what what type of anti Indian racism, bigotry, what exactly you know, what are these? What are these awful acts? Well, I mean, a lot of it has been bullying and harassment of British Indian labor members, not least on social media, which is actually a bit of a scourge in modern times, except for when we're organizing pleasant events like this. And routinely, British Indian labor members in recent years are labeled hindutva, which is a new term that I wasn't familiar with previously. And it's used in the same way, deployed in the same way that Zionist is used to attack indirectly British Jewish people. And so there's that recent phenomenon. We've also had incidents of British Indian labour members being prevented from participating in party meetings and events. We've had examples and cases of Hindu and Sikh traditions in particular, being mocked and insulted. And often in open forums. We've certainly got a numerous examples of complaints of anti Indian bigotry and racism to Party HQ being completely ignored. And this includes two very substantial complaints that I submitted back in 2017 and 2019, neither of which even received a reply, can you believe it from labour HQ, let alone any kind of resolution. Then, of course, if we look back to the summer of last year, when we got to the Labour Party national conference, we saw the adoption of that emergency motion on Kashmiri separatism. And the chair of the conference, Claudia Webb MP, who I think is set to have her criminal hearing on the 11th of November, the magistrate's court, chaired and allow that emergency debate to go ahead, and we saw where many of us
are anti Indian bigotry and racism spewed and rhetoric on the floor of a mainstream political parties national conference. We then go going on to further examples talking about more examples, particularly in regards to politics. We've had instances in the Labour Party in recent years, but but specifically, let's look at 2019. In regards to parliamentary selections, there was a big debacle in Leicester Eastern I was involved in that admittedly, I should declare an interest in regards to what happened there. But we had other instances of safe ish parliamentary seats up and down the country in Ealing North for example, in Birmingham, in Ilford south in the south, we saw the local council leader a guy called Giles aswad, who was going to be a shoo in to be the prospective parliamentary candidate for the 2019 general election. And just before the election itself, miraculously, a complaint emerged, accusing him of impropriety, he was conveniently taken off the off the panel and a far left socialist ally of Jeremy Corbyn was selected, and not long after their jazz Atwal was exonerated of any wrongdoing. So that was another example of of open kind of corrupt practices and dodgy practices in the Labour Party to deliberately block and prevent British Indian labour members from seeking to be representatives. Last year, we also saw no not last year, gosh, it was earlier this summer, dozens of minority MPs signed an offer letter to Priti Patel, accusing her of being accusing her of not having authentic, authentic experience of racism. And they said that her However, by virtue of being an Asian woman, didn't justify or make her an authority on all forms of racism, whilst at the same time they themselves the these black and Asian Labour MPs relied on that same authority with which to chastise Patel. So that's a quick run through of that of the kind of bigotry and racism we're talking about. And I'll obviously we'll have a bit more of a discussion later on. And the reason I spend Gosh, 910 months from what happened in November last year in regards to the parliamentary debacle, which really was a bit of an eye opener for me, and then I spent a good 910 months, doing lots of reading and research, a lot of soul searching, speaking to lots of people really trying to make sense of why, you know, we know we know how the Labour Party has become anti Indian, and racist and bigoted. But why is this happening? And the best explanation that I and many others have come up with, is, of course, the shift in labor politics from kind of social democracy, which we saw under new labor, mainstream moderate, sensible social democratic ideals, and then the party veered off to the left and and embraced a Marxist socialism, foursquare Initially, the problem began under Ed Miliband and then of course, it was exacerbated by Corbin. So I wrap up on this kind of key point which is which is simply this the the the philosophy the guiding philosophy of the Labour Party now is what I understand and what certainly more accomplished writers and speakers have talked about as postmodern Marxists. New Neo Marxism and what it does as a guiding philosophy as it tries to reinvent classical Marxism, but instead of the traditional
ddddd traditional hostility between the kind of working class proletariat and the ruling class bourgeoisie, what it seeks to do is firstly, separate all individuals into different identity groups, and then it categorizes all these various different identity groups into two categories either that of being part of the oppressed category without being part of the oppressor category. So, instead of a class struggle, Neo Marxism, postmodern Marxism, which is now the guiding philosophy of the Labour Party seeks seeks to exacerbate a power struggle between different identity groups. And of course, the explanation quite simply, is the British Indians are too damn successful for their own good British Indians have risen through the ranks in the space of one generation, from being at the bottom of the ladder, socioeconomically to now being at the top. And for the Labour Party. In particular, I'm talking about labour members when I talk about the Labour Party, because it is, of course, a membership organization in the minds of British Labour members. British Indians are fair game because they are successful, they're aspirational. They have values of educational attainment and family and hard work and faith and all these things. And that's because of those intrinsic values that are integral to British Indian culture. And that's the reason why British Indians have have gotten to the top in terms of socio economics now for labor members, British Indians are fair game. So it's because of this kind of identity politics and new Marxist ideology.
Thank you for that. Thank you. So I'd like to invite Sonny now to give us his sort of initial thoughts.
Thanks for that Sandeep. And then I also want to start by saying Actually, it's really nice to be on such a panel. I've we're all admired all your work from sometimes far, sometimes close, sometimes ever disagreed with you all. So you know, then that's fine. That's that's part of debate as it should be.
I've been a labour member for about 10 years.
And during that time, I've run a lot of campaigns as well as publications, aimed at more the left side of the party, and probably more to the left than Sunday biz. And, but, you know, I share some of the concerns that he has outlined. But I do see things in a slightly different way. And that's what I want to shed light on today. So firstly, you know, is the Labour Party losing Indians. And that's, I think, true, although it should be taken with a grain of salt. What we saw was, I think, if we look at the polls, is that in certain areas, like Leicester, and how east, we saw a shift away from the Labour Party, but more broadly, we didn't necessarily see a big shift amongst all British Hindus, towards the Conservative Party. So I think there is still a lot of reticence to vote for the conservatives. But I do see how in certain areas and very targeted campaigns, the conservatives have been able to rule over British Hindus, and especially in Harrow East where Bob Blackman has, you know, spent more time at the mothers than any other local Hindus do. And and people appreciate that in those areas. And, you know, I mean, I've been reporting on the dirty tricks in that area for quite a while I won't go into that. But, you know, there is a lot of slag, slagging off going on as well towards Hindus who sort of seek to challenge some of the local community leaders, who I think also play their own game of picking one person over another. I mean, for example, during this election campaign, there was a blanket ban on allowing any labour candidate or, you know, a politician to even speak at a Hindu mother and sort of say, Well, this is what I believe in, you know, if you're not even giving them a platform and saying, you know, Okay, tell us your side of the story or what you think on this issue, then you're effectively you know, taking my side and, and to that extent, that happened in Leicester. It happened in London as well. And I think actually what happened in less than I've said this before was absolute. Not just a tragedy, but it was was a fast You know, they should have picked a local candidate. And instead they parachuted in someone who was loyal to Corbin in the same way as you said. So they did that with just Atwal in Elford east. And again, it really, really not only shocked I mean, it's not shocking, to be honest. You know, the Gordon Brown did the same Tony Blair did the same. But it was quite blatant. And I remember reporting Actually, I, this has been going on for a while. I mean, I reported in 2005 I think it was when South all the conservatives had a defection from loads of local labour MPC quads because they installed Brenda Sharma at that time, even though the local Ealing council leader was a woman, an Asian woman suddenly going to wall and she was not even allowed to be part of the you know, the shortlist. So what what what what we're talking about here is a series of, you know, issues what is to do with factionalism, which is very prominent in the Labour Party, and sometimes overlays with the, the politics, which is sort of Corbin wanting to have his own left wing socialist people in their, you know, and so all these issues are sort of joining together. And sometimes it's useful to separate them out what I saw in lesser in fit east. as has happened in Salford beforehand, were people stitching up local constituency, sort of selections for their own agenda, not on not because it's a political agenda, but because they wanted an ally in power. So that's one thing, you know, and the left has sort of,
obviously, you know, ignored all this, because, you know, it suits their purpose. And one question that they always come up with, yeah, of course, the, you know, the Hindus and, and the Indians are more middle class. They're racist, or they, you know, they're Ugandan. So, of course, they're gonna, you know, vote for the Conservative Party. And, of course, it doesn't happen to it doesn't have to be that way. Because if you look at the modern Labour Party, actually, and there's loads of middle class people in the Labour Party these days, so just because you're going, becoming more middle class doesn't necessarily mean that you're going to start becoming conservative. But what's really going on, I think, is that in one sentence, it's a bad state of affairs. What's the labor essentially is done, I think, is basically said, we're going to take the Muslims and we're going to take the Sikhs and the conservatives have done more outreach with Hindus and Jews and therefore, in a way they have, they have drawn up this sort of the minorities in need piles, and sort of done outreach with certain communities and not with others. So even though Josh Atwal, you know, was locked out of, you know, the local constituency, you didn't really see a big fall in support amongst Sikhs, for the Labour Party, because in those areas, they had a lot of engagement and a lot of support. Still with six even though a lot of Sikh organizations were angry at the wages at work got thrown out, but there wasn't like a good workers around the country saying we're gonna bind the Labour Party because of what happened to just Atwal. Why, because the Labour Party has done a lot of engagement with Sikhs over the years. And so in a way, this is what the issue comes down to, if you engage with a community, then that community is going to stick with you even if there are bumps on the road. And what's happened is that the Labour Party has essentially on the left has essentially taken Hindus for granted for a long time, British Indians, what again, kinds of British Indians because you can divide them up into Hindus and Sikhs and Tamils and gujarathi. Isn't there lots of different communities, but certainly I think they have taken casualties for granted for a long time and now, you know, the opportunity was there for the conservatives to sort of you bring them over thanks to what happened in India. And and last point on that what's happening in India is truly to me very dangerous because it brought a poison into the communities in this country. Because what we've got is a party in India, which has used WhatsApp misinformation, lots of that to spread poison Amongst communities, turn Hindus against Muslims, against Sikhs, etc, etc. And that poison is seeping into the body politic of Sikhs, Hindus and Muslims in this country. And that's what worries me. Because, you know, all of the Labour Party has no clue about a lot of these dynamics we do. And we have to be much more vigilant about it. And it does frustrate me, I suddenly pointed out there is a lot of people who immediately apply this test to Hindus. And again, are you a hindutva? supporter? You know, are you what do you think about the Indian government? Where do you stand with the Indian government? Almost like as if, if you take certain sort of stances, you're automatically hindutva. And that's dangerous. It's like saying, you know, to Muslims, are you you know, where do you stand on Palestine? Or therefore, you must be a jihadi, you know, and those kind of in the way that if you would not treat a Muslim that way, then do not do that with Hindus, or Sikhs, etc, etc. But unfortunately, this level of debate has become very common on the left. And it's frustrating. And, you know, I don't think that To summarize, I don't think that the left and the Labour Party has necessarily lost British Hindus or British Indians forever. But I do think right now, it's happening right in front of our eyes, because the Labour Party has taken the whole these lots of minority communities for granted for too long. And that needs to change.
Thank you for that Sunny, thank you. And I'd like to invite sadhya now to just maybe build on some of those points, and then add our own points in particular, society, we've had some different sunny speak about what they fill out the issues or, you know, to what extent is the scale of the problem? What are your thoughts on it more generally, when you're looking at the British political left's relationship with British Indians more broadly? Hmm.
Thank you so much for inviting me
for organizing this discussion and raising these, this question, of course, to those of you that are watching along right now. Thank you. It's lovely to be here with them. Some deep and sunny have followed both of them online as well. I was quite saddened to see what happened with some deep so I just wanted to say some deep, it's good to finally meet you meet you. wanted to start off with some more stats actually, according to the 2011 census. Indians are the third largest ethnic group in the UK making up 2.3% of the overall population, and 1.3% of the overall population are Hindu and 0.7%. I see and I think that Hindu Sikh elements important because we often hear Indian Hindu used interchangeably. So a 2019 Runnymede report revealed that British Indians have tended towards voting labour in general elections, with well over 50% voting labour in the 2010 2015 and 2017 general election. However, British Indian conservative votes rose from 30% in 2010, to 40% in 2017. British Indians have been economically outperforming their earnings outperforming our earnings and their South Asian counterparts in the UK for some time now. So, why this shift in 2017 in Asia, the idea that higher earnings automatically leads to an increased likelihood of voting conservative is not necessarily true. As both of my colleagues have pointed out, British Indians were loyal to the Labour Party was the Labour Party was loyal to them. Since the 2010 election, increased numbers of British Pakistanis and Bangladeshis have opted to vote, the Labour Party was more to share these ethnic diasporas voting for the conservatives. With a migration of South Asians to Britain, the political conflicts that had blighted this region have unfortunately also been imported to Britain, and have transposed themselves into the British political scene in interesting ways. One such recent example was the Labour Party's resolution on Kashmir, which Sandeep just mentioned. So on the 26th of September 2019, the National Executive Council of the Labour Party passed an emergency motion, calling for international observers to enter the Kashmir region to monitor the situation which Corbyn very kindly volunteered to do. And this was the BJP party, the BJP. BJP is revocation of Kashmir is legal recognition to limited autonomy under Article 370. This was subsequently viewed by many British Indians as a move by the Labour Party to quote the favor of Pakistani unmade booty voters whose vote would be decisive in them. Upcoming December 2019 election, such as the effect of this motion being passed by the Labour Party. That campaign was launched during the 2019 election by the British Hindu and Indian votes matter campaign, which tried to dissuade voters from voting labour, although they weren't favoring any other political party, the labour rep resolution on Kashmir, the protests outside the Indian High Commission in London, including one protest on Diwali and the support for the prescribed Jammu Kashmir Liberation Front from the Labour Party reasons cited for their songs.
Eventually, the backlash generated among some of the Indian diaspora forced Corbin to issue an apology as the motion was considered hostile to both Indians and India. In a letter to the Hindustan Times in November 2009 Corbin wrote, quote, the emergency motion and Kashmir came through as part of the democratic process of the labor of the labor conference. However, there is a recognition that some of the language used within it could be misinterpreted as hostile to India and the Indian diaspora. Labour understands the concerns the Indian community in Britain has about the situation in Kashmir and takes these concerns very seriously. Needless to say, The Reluctant and evasive times struck by Jeremy Corbyn and his apology did little to modify the concerns of the British or British Indians, many of whom were formerly loyal to the Labour Party, another contributing factor to the alienation of Britain, British Indian voters from the Labour Party was its reluctance to field Indian candidates in the 2019 election. The Labour friend of India group commented that, quote, we express our regret that the Labour Party has selected just one Indian, one candidate of Indian heritage in 39, safely receipts, and no Indian heritage candidate in the hundred target seats. Furthermore, despite the National Executive executive committees, panels shortlisting or even selecting candidates in areas with large in Indian communities such as Leicester, Ealing, Ilford, West, Bromwich and Darby, no Indian heritage candidates were selected and which already some people also mentioned. More generally, there appears to be a growing trend, a trend among the Labour Party and sections of the left particularly those influenced by post modernism and critical racial theory to resent successful ethnic minority groups. For instance, note the disparaging way, that a 2019 Runnymede trust report describes British Hindu voters. Quote, Hindus are the ethnic minority group that most fits the stylized story of generational political change in Britain, as this electorate is increasingly made up of UK born children of immigrants, rather than their parents who face more discrimination on arrival, and tend to be employed in working class occupations. Indeed, voters have become more similar to their white to their right wing white voters, more middle class more suburban and wealthier. Know the analogy here used to reference British Indians, the more integrated and press prosperous they become, the more they ascend to be white. This conflation of socioeconomic status and race for political purposes creates a narrative that excludes ethnic minority groups advance that have advanced themselves over the generations. This divisive rhetoric portrays comparatively poorer and more culturally insular diasporas as somehow racially and culturally authentic and passive victims of structural racism. If they are successful, they are rendered sellouts, as they are no longer disadvantage and must have become honorary White's individuals from ethnic minority groups that have risen in socio economic terms but chosen their own political path often report being racially abused by up by both left wing activists and their own community members. The attempts by critical race theorists to devise a racial taxonomy whereby political persuasion and cultural loyalties can be ascertained solely on the basis of skin color, has now been extended to Indians. Similar to how white working class individuals are often labeled Nazi fascist and racist for raising legitimate concerns about issues such as migration, integration and Islamic supremacism. Indians and Hindus broaching these subjects are increasingly labeled in that but also cost is I noticed some of that happening when this event was advertised I had a few lefty Levine, who messaged me very very quickly hyping up right hundred club and making absolutely no, no valid points. Gone are the days when the Labour Party could blindly rely on indian indian votes. Thanks separatists politics has rightly cost them support from this increasingly prosperous and educated diaspora.
Thank you for that idea. Thank you. So I'm going to open up the discussion a bit but I wanted to go to stand up first. So and sunny and sunny have also made this point As well as you know, we've have, you know, British Indian Hindus, British Indian Sikhs. They're also notable Muslim and Roman Catholic sections within the broader British Indian population. Sonny's also talked about the sort of diversity of, you know, good royalties from zombies, South Indians, as well. But But send them, you know, up there unless you do have that religious diversity within the Indian origin population there. Is it? Is it more the case that when we're talking about this loosening of the relationship between the political left and British Indians is it's particularly sharp amongst British Indian Hindus? Or is this something that you're noticing across all of the different religious groups, which have that shared Indian ancestry, especially in your neck of the woods?
you might be muted.
Sorry, I muted myself, we've got fireworks going off for someone else.
Oh, it's Aaron Lee, and
people are writing lockdown or one find out.
So yeah, sorry, in order to the up to that point, and a couple of quick on the points on place, comments that I that I've had. So I think there's a particular issue in regards to Hindu and Sikh communities. And the difficulty here is that epically whenever I talk about British Indians and British Indian
accent exodus from the left, and I'm sure all of us are in this kind of, on the same wavelength. We don't wish to segregate British Indians, whether they're Hindu, Muslim, Sikh, or whatever. But the problem is, for the far left, in particular, for that kind of socialist Marxist mindset, that's what they want to do. That's what they enjoy doing. It's the age old colonial trick of divide and conquer. So it's all very fashionable to turn against the Hindu and Sikh communities, and perhaps be more sympathetic to Muslim communities in parts of the country. And one of the points I was going to make in regard in regards to some of the central points that Sonny was making, is that actually the Sikh vote, and the Sikh labour vote has collapsed from my experience in Wolverhampton and West Bromwich and in Leicester. And another thing that came to mind, as he was talking, he was that this kind of separating people out into different identity groups, as I mentioned earlier, in accordance with that Neo Marxist, postmodern Marxist ideology is appalling. It's disgraceful. And that's the kind of thing that those of us who are, you know, second and third generation British Indians, we should not want to put up with it, we should not allow it to happen by proxy. Because that identity politics is not the way that our communities and our and our faith and our cultures have existed, you know, we will not we know that, obviously, the kind of Indian mindset is more kind of secular and inclusive. And it's only more in recent years, because of this hard left politics, pioneered by Jeremy Corbyn and his left tenants that things are really getting a bit out of hand, one of the one of the kind of wider points I wanted to make was that, you know, for me, personally, I'm not that keen on fighting out Indian politics here. You know, there are lots of, there are lots of different things going on in Indian politics. And I don't actually fully understand them, I have to admit, but what I don't want is for us to fall into the trap of that divide and conquer that kind of far left trap. Because the real problem in my experience, and the research that I've done is that it's it's socialist Marxist ideology, which in my view, is a doctrine of hatred. You know, it's authoritarian, it's, it's totalitarian, it's kind of a left wing extremism, and that left wing extremism in the Labour Party in particular, came from influx of extreme left wing ideologues on the one hand, striving for unachievable perfection, at the expense of pragmatism and competence. And also an influx of these kind of far left academic intellectuals, many of which, you know, have this kind of bitterness, this kind of resentment built into them, and and a sense of inferiority. And what's happened is that this kind of this this socialist Marxist Brigade, when they've when they've taken over the Labour Party, when they've, when they've infected and polluted once great British mainstream political party, with their hatred with their bigotry with their anti semitism with their anti Indian racism. What they've done of course, is is, is pollute and politics pollute society pollute the culture of political discourse. And the other thing I wanted to say just a couple of other final points Just very quickly, I know we're, as we don't have much time, and is that there are other aspects in regards to these far left Marxist socialists as well, you ought to, we ought to consider and look at as to why British Indians have been turned away being being put off the Labour Party. On the one hand, we've got people who want to be white saviors, you know, they have this kind of Messiah complex as Jeremy Corbyn clearly has. And then you've got these black and Asian members on the far left, who act as racial gatekeepers, who want to tell us who is a proper black or proper Asian person. And then if you don't play along, and if any of us, for instance, who are, you know, free thinking and articulate and, and we know what we what we believe. And if we were to challenge far left Marxist socialist doctrine, which is now prevalent in the Labour Party, they would use racial epithets against us, we would believe Uncle Tom's or coconuts, you know, that indicating that in that kind of mindset in that kind of Marxist socialist mindset, you're a coconut because you're acting white. In other words, black and Asian people who are free thinking, who are articulate, who are willing to stand up for what they believe in, are acting white because they believe only white people should be acting that way. So it's that kind of built in racism that built in bigotry that I despise. And obviously that's why I left the Labour Party. That's why I believe many people are leaving the Labour Party and in British Indian voters in their droves are turning away from the Labour Party. I don't think the party is repairable. I hope I'm wrong. But I think it's a lost cause. I think the rot is just too deep.
Can I just add something to your place? I think during the BLM discussion, we had quite a lot of people. But a lot of free speech advocates, a lot of people that were opposing BLM in Britain saying do not import Americanized racial politics to not not America. Right. And I think that similar we need exactly the same attitude when it comes to India, Pakistan and that conflict in that region. We're not India, we're not Pakistan. That isn't our, and actually, Sandeep makes a valid point, a lot of young, second, third, fourth generation migrants from that, that region don't actually understand what's happening up there. And to have the Labour Party trying to pit us against one another for their own political game, we have to be very, very careful about they're not wanting us to live cohesively together there need that conflict to feed off of that. And something else this and some people say raised about
last night, I was just gonna get into
maybe a good opportunity to bring sunny and sunny, would you like to build on some of the points that we've had? You know, is? Is it the fact that it is it is it identity politics that we say that sort of sort of that tribal identity identitarian ism on the left, which grew under Jeremy Corbyn sleeps with the Labour Party? Do you feel that's contributed perhaps towards, you know, a loosening or most of the less relationship with British Indians more generally?
Oh, I mean, that's a whole package of can of worms, that you've got to open and itself? Look, I don't think it's just possible to blame the Labour Party for this. I've been, like I said, Men for 10 years before that I didn't vote for labour and love voting for Lib Dems in the 2010 election for my sins. But the point is that like to just to give you one example of what happened the last election, the National Council of Hindu temples, wrote a specific letter to the Labour Party saying that they were going to ban the Labour Party from attending any motions or you know, and then calling them something like, you know, associated them, associating them with al Qaeda and ISIS because they're supported Pakistan. So you know, this, we can, obviously condemn people for breaking down groups, by religion or by country. But I don't think that we can entirely absolve the Labour Party of blame here. There are specific groups within the UK who want to bring South Asian politics to this country. And you have to remember that during this election, there was a lot of WhatsApp forwards going around. I reported on this continuously. A lot of it was related to what's happening in South Asia, a lot of it was related to India, and the politics there. And so it's impossible to disentangle them and say, we can't break down the community. Look, I agree with you. I run a website called Barfi calm I've been reporting on South Asians for 20 years, I hate the idea of breaking people down into smaller and smaller groups and then selling them against each other. But we also have to acknowledge there are differences between communities, they, the Indian community is broken down into Hindus, Muslims, Sikhs, Christians, and even atheists and Parsees and all the rest of it, you know, so that the fact of the matter is that each community is also different. And so, for example, in this country, you know, no one was appealing to Sikhs on the basis of what was happening in Kashmir, right, because that was seen as very much a Hindu issue. There wasn't a C group writing to the Labour Party saying that, you know, keep your nose out of politics in India, that was the Hindu form of Britain and the National Council of Hindu temples, I've reported on all of this. So on the one hand, I think that yes, the Labour Party is to blame for what's going on. But on the other hand, there are people in this country also trying to set groups up against each other, and we shouldn't let them off, you know, without condemning what they're doing, or without saying, What is this that you're doing? So that's what I'm trying to say here, like the Labour Party. I mean, look, I don't think the Labour Party, I wasn't a fan of Jeremy Corbyn. I supported in fact, the Lisa 94. Leader. But I'm happy with where, where customers taking on, I think one of the things that he's doing well is staying away from the culture wars, that many on the left of the Labour Party want to keep on starting up. And he's staying away from all of that, and I support it, because I think this is a trap for the Labour Party, and it's a trend for the left. So we don't want to go down that route. But if there are groups in the UK, and I've criticized Hindu groups, I've criticized Sikh groups, I've criticized Muslim groups over the years, everyone, you know, if there are groups in this country who are trying to foment tension between communities, we have a duty, in my opinion, to call them out and say, This is wrong, what you're doing. You know, and, and that's what we're trying to do in the election coverage, which is say, Actually, there are some Hindu groups who are blatantly trying to set communities against each other. And that's wrong. And the same way Muslim groups were trying to do the same thing as well. So there are the difference between the communities, it's not just the Labour Party, who is who's, you know, trying to create trouble. Okay, thank you, sonny. So,
did you want to say something there? I did,
saying, um, But the trouble is that the Labour Party gets involved in that that's what we're all seeing as outsiders, right. That rather than them going, actually, this isn't something we're going to accept, because this isn't, this is a country we're in. We're in Britain, and we are all a nation, we are all supposed to be working cohesively together, rather than doing that they get volved. In that, you know, that environment has been created by separatists. They they're thriving on that. I don't see the Conservative Party behaving in the same way. Not that I'm a conservative either. But what it's something that Sandeep said about the the coconuts and the Aqua tongs and such. So anyone who does successfully integrate, and that doesn't feed into this kind of separatist politics is is seen as the enemy of the Labour Party as somebody rather than somebody who could help work against the things that you're talking about Sonny? So I think that the issue is that the Labour Party specifically have a habit of facilitating some of this separatism by getting involved rather than going Actually, this is something that we shouldn't get involved in, because this is causing division rather than use T. They're not a unifying force anymore.
I absolutely agree with that. I mean, I in fact, I've written articles saying that quoting Priti Patel and Rishi sumac, a coconut is terrible and goes against, in fact, racist. I've said it, I've said it is bigoted. But and I've had flack for that, too. Right. And I think that what's going on, though, is that the left is going through its own contradictions and internal arguments on identity politics, which like I said, is a separate issue to unpack. The Labour Party is getting drawn into that, which I think is a mistake. And I think Sandeep is right to warn against us, either yours or right to one against ours. And it's a problem, but they haven't really figured this out. They haven't really gone through the journey and realize that this is a problem and that, you know, we're getting drawn into these issues, which other people actually, you know, should be dealing with. And that's the end and that's why we're losing a lot of people. You're absolutely right. But I don't think the situation is, you know, as Sandeep said, irrepairable. I do think it's possible for the Labour Party to get its act together. And I hope so I hope it doesn't the case dama.
Yeah. So assume that there you say that sunny struck more of a positive note, when compared to your doom and gloom. earlier on, where you said that this relationship is tight. It's just it's beyond repair. But say if someone asked you what would the Labour Party need to do in terms of rebuilding its ties with British Indian voters that it's lost, not just in the last election, but this could be voters that's lost in the last two or three general election cycles? Where do they need it? Isn't that just do not bother with these territorial disputes in the subcontinent? Is it more about that their messages their political messages wrong? Does it do the need to talk more about the significance of the family unit? Does it need to talk a bit more about entrepreneur entrepreneurial ism? What do you feel that? It now Stormer has come in? And, you know, it's pretty safe to say that most people think the storm is a significant improvement when compared to its predecessor? Where would you What would you like to hear from the New Labour leader if we were looking at labor repairing that damage that's been caused particularly under Corbin? leadership?
a great question. Thanks, Rakesh. So that's brilliant. And that this is this is probably my favorite or most important point that I would like to make tonight. And that and it simply is simply this. And British Indian values are British values. So a lot of our fundamental values in British Indian culture are the same, or very similar to mainstream working class, middle class, British values, whether it's to do with, you know, community, cohesion, collective support, family, family support, faith, love of country, a hard work aspiration, educational attainment, wanting for yourselves and your kids a better life than you had. So all these kind of standard mainstream, sensible British values, they are British Indian values. And so there's two things really fundamentally an answer to your question that either the Labour Party would want to do. Number one, as you alluded to, and as some sunny insider have been talking about, is to stop trying to divide and conquer British Indians, stop patronizing the community, stop talking down to them, certainly stop treating them with such disrespect and disdain cut out the anti Indian bigotry and racism. Obviously, as I said, At the start of the event, the anti semitism in the Labour Party is the biggest problem. That's the main problem that has infected the left, the anti Indian bigotry and racism is a secondary issue. It's not as pernicious as the anti semitism, but it's also worth addressing and resolving all so that's the first thing, which is to reestablish a better relationship with British Indians, and also the future generation of British Asians, which at which premise look like us, you know, kind of professionals, and working in mainstream jobs, all the rest of it. The other thing is more of a general political point. And it's, and I've kind of touched on it a couple of times today. And this is where I don't think cast armor has the courage, the desire to actually do the hard work, do what needs to be done. He's too busy, in my view, kneeling down on one knee, you know, all this kind of just gestural, nonsense politics, because he has, he did that. And they try to backtrack on it. And it's kind of it's kind of absorbing this stuff from America, which we don't want to go down that route of civil unrest around identity politics, and all this stuff. So what he needs to do, but I don't think you will, and is going to scalpel and cut the cancer, which has infected the Labour Party. I mean, we're talking flexible and everybody wants to kind of mainstream left wing party in our country, the socialist Marxist ik far left extreme politics, which has completely taken over all kind of all effects of the Labour Party, in fact of the party, you know, just just dreadful, nasty, bigoted, hateful, divisive stuff. Because of these, because of these deluded, deranged ideologues, and resentful intellectuals. They need to make the tough decisions. You know, suspending Jeremy Corbyn is a very small step in the right direction, you don't need to suspend him, you need to throw him out of the party. And then you need to throw out the other 30 or so far left Marxist socialists in Parliament and actually just reestablish yourself as a kind of normal, modern mainstream British political party that actually doesn't talk down to British People and doesn't just disrespect British Indians in the way that it doesn't British Jews, or the working class or the middle class, so sorry, I rambled on.
No, please, please don't use the word. So it's great to
know. But I just don't think and i don't think his timer will do it. I think he'll he'll, you know, focus on some of these kind of peripheral changes, tinkering around the edges, you know, Corbin up, I fully suspect Corbin will be let back into the Labour Party. And that's the reason why I will not I can never see myself rejoining the Labour Party. I think it's a doctrine of hatred. It's divisive stuff. And it's just a shame. It took me 20 years to wake up to this stuff, you know, but what happened, of course, is like, it's like, you know that the there's the anecdotes of when you put a when you put a toad in a in a pot of water, and then put it on the on the cooker, and then turn up the gas and the water boil slowly. Now, you know, you don't notice it until it's too late. But I joined was was New Labour, social democracy, what I left was authoritarian, far left Marxist socialism. And that's a very different kettle of fish. Let me tell you.
Okay, thank you, Sandy. I'm so sunny. Just to just to hear your final thoughts before we have side wrap up the event. When we're talking about that sort of rebuilding phase, winning back lost British Indian voters send it there perhaps feels that Stormer doesn't have the spine or he doesn't have the spirit in him to to lead on that healing process? Would you say you're a bit more optimistic in terms of Stormers capabilities on this front?
I will say that, I think it will be a bad idea for Kier Starmer to throw out socialist MPs. That's the job of their constituents, not the leader of the party. But you know, I respect that people have different opinions. And that's fine. I have lots of different opinions to socialists and the Labour Party to other people on the right of the party. That thing about it. It's a broad church. But let's go back to the original question, which is about specifically around British Indians. And I don't think that I think fundamentally, what happened here is that I don't think the most British Indians paid that much attention to the inner workings of the Labour Party, they probably didn't like Corbin probably thought he was a bit too socialist. And, but you know, they haven't paid that much attention. What I do think is the problem is that they have not been engaged properly, and they've been taken for granted for too long. As you know, these people are always going to vote labour, so we don't have to worry too much. And that lack of engagement is the principal reason why Hindus are moving away. Sikhs are on the verge of moving away, Jews have already moved away, and other communities may also move away. So working class white people, for example, that's a big problem for the Labour Party. So somehow, the party has to engage with all these groups, it may not give them everything that they want. But nevertheless, if you don't make a community of people feel valued, engaged and feel like they're being listened to, then they are going to vote for someone else. It's that simple. When it comes to politics, it doesn't have to be well, then, you know, Marxist or Neo liberal. It doesn't have to be how, where they sit on the political spectrum, you engage your community, those people will talk to you, if they feel like you're being listened to, they will vote for you. It's that simple. So I think that fundamentally, the problem with the I think the Corbyn Labour Party was that they just took the Hindu vote for granted. And there was an element of thinking that because these people are in India, they're related to India and India is seen as sort of this oppressor of Kashmir and all this kind of stuff. They kind of rolled that together and sort of said, we don't have to worry too much about the Indians, we don't really want to focus on them. We get down this road, we're actually engaging or having strong British Hindu leaders within the Labour Party is not seen as a priority, right. And if you don't have those people there, engaging with the community on your behalf, then the community is going to feel ignored. It's that simple. And that's what happened. And so if you want to go back to the basics, the Labour Party has to engage every community that it wants to win back. It's possible, you know, and the, let's not be beat around the bush here. The Conservative Party has exactly the same problems when it comes to other communities when it comes to racism when it comes to taking communities for granted. The same issue applies in lots of different circumstances. They're highly pro business when they're trying to push through Brexit. You In these different difficult circumstances, so I think that these change these whole these trends will ebb and flow, you know, and the Labour Party is not going to be banished forever. It can can make its way back.
Thank you, Satya just to hear your final thoughts. So do you think that it's possible under Stormers leadership for Labour to rebuild those ties with lost British Indian voters who may have moved away from the party? Not necessarily now, you know, become diehard conservatives, many of them simply are just not as supportive as the Labour Party's they used to be. That doesn't mean they've automatically become Tories either. Did you sense there is an opportunity for Stormer to rebuild those ties. And if you do what, what kind of what kind of political message, you know what the main principles that he should really focus on?
I think, Stan,
I don't trust stammer. And I think a lot of people trust armor, I think he, people have realized that he will go with whatever he thinks is going to gain him more more popularity. So he will kneel one day, and then the next day he will, you know, denounce his kneeling. So I don't think he I don't think people trust him. I do think that they have to do is start talking about the issues that affect the majority of the country again. And then people will automatically start trusting them. Because at the moment where they're trying to win over some communities, and for a long time where they've been playing communities off one another, they continue down that path, people aren't going to trust them. They don't trust them right now. But that trust is going to continue to combo until there's nothing left. I mean, I think I imagined in my lifetime that the Labour Party is going to become completely irrelevant. I think it's, you know, it's irrelevant is kind of growing, but I think it's going to become completely irrelevant and redundant. Our political system currently has made it difficult for other parties to take its place. But I do think we need a new, Truly Social Democratic Party. The the hard left activists in the Labour Party that have the idealize Tony Benn didn't even realize how proud of an Englishman he was. I think we have to have that pride of being English back. Because that's the only thing in Britain that is going to unify all communities, because that's who we all are. Like Sandeep said, right? We're all British. And there's nothing wrong with that. Stop treating that as if that's something poisonous. You know, one by one survey, every community that they dislike is being denounced and treated as if they are some kind of far right activist people don't like who they are, or what they have to say. So I think that they have to start coming back to unifying principles. And they need to start talking about ideas and policies, rather than pitting individuals, individuals against each other, because they've been doing that for a really long time now.
Thank you, but just add my thoughts. I do think that our social democratic patriotism, which emphasizes the significance of the family unit, entrepreneurship, also that, you know, their sense of humanity, and that faith, you know, can be a source of strength and optimism for many across a range of religious groups. I think that would be in my personal view, I think that would be a positive direction for the British left more generally. But some that sunny Saudi, I'd really like to thank you for participating in tonight's event of thoroughly wonderful discussion and intellectually stimulating one I hope, everyone who joined in and watch this online event agree with me, so I'd like to thank you for participating tonight.
Thanks, Rocky. Thank you. Thank you.