we have also identified some some systemic barriers, like, like, like, potential applicants, especially those new to the ICANN processes, you know, facing hurdles you know, such as, on the one hand, very complex paperwork you know, limited, very limited awareness and lack of local support, local support in some cases. So in that regard, you know, the guy recommended, you know, an immediate review. You know, conducting, you know, the ASP assessment now and not after 20 applications. You know, who, on the one hand, diagnose obstacles, like, for example, outreach gaps, you know, funding accessibility. And we can talk about that because we also gave some ideas about having access to funding and everything else, but that, that would be a different conversation. And on the other hand, to propose mitigations, like, for example, simplified forms, you know, and you know, regional workshops that that's something else we suggested, right? Another thing would be targeted outreach. You know, re redirecting resources to, for example, you know, high potential and underserved regions, you know, via, and this is again, just an idea, you know, government, government led awareness campaigns. You know, leveraging, leveraging somehow, ICANN stakeholder teams whenever possible. And partnership, partnerships in general, you know, with local registries and ccTLDs whenever possible. And then in this regard, finally, some sort of budget flexibility, preparing to expand funding if qualified applications exceed the 40. I think it was 40 to 45 cap, if I recall correctly, ensuring again, that that no disturbing candidate is excluded, which was the whole idea right from the beginning, right? And I can, I can quote, you know, something coming directly from, from, from the guy communicate, which is that, you know, at the current pace. You know, the current pace may not allow, and I'm quoting, may not allow for timely adjustments. You know, the gap urges immediate action to salvage the ASPs, inclusive purpose. End quote that that's coming directly from, from from there, from the gap, communicate so very quickly. Again. The third point was gang readiness, you know, for gTLD evaluation. So, so again, as the application window nears, you know, the gang must our view, you know, strengthen. You know, our preparatory efforts. You know, on some strategic focus, focus areas like early interventions, you know, in order to maximize tools like, like the early warnings, you know, to flag problematic strings, like, for example, culturally, let's say culturally sensitive terms, you know, and fishing risks and so on and so forth. And, you know, we can, we can have some, some deeper conversations in that regard later on. But for the sake of time, you know, I would also like to address at this point, you know, abuse mitigation, you know, preemptively addressing concerns about DNS abuse escalation. No, again, I'm not going to refer to spam Mal, where fishing, farming and so on, tied directly tied to gTLD expansion and and also collaborative vigilance, you know, got volunteers you know to work, and we have already expressed that in many different places to work with topic leads, on timeline tracking, on the one hand, and also developing position papers for high risk categories like, for example, health, a very important thing in terms of public interest and finance, another very sensitive area. You know, some, some gag delegations highlighted. You know, the spam and fishing risks. You know, from, from, from rapid, let's say DNS growth. You know, urging the GAC, GAC members again, urging the GAC itself, you know, to advise applicants on mandatory abuse mitigation plans on the one hand, and pushing ICANN or pushing in a good sense, you know, like, like for enforceable SLAs with register registrars whenever possible. Again, SLA, standing for service level agreements. We can talk about details, you know, later on, but, but again, for the second, for the sake of time, you know, I'll pause here and hand it back to you, Lars, and my apologies if I run out of time. So I have more things, but, but again, over to you