Now. We get to now we get to jump to my soapbox and social justice here. Just like all incidences of income inequality, larger foundations versus smaller funded foundations find themselves by adding heads and the larger foundations have more benefits, and here's why. So, when you create a private foundation, you're entitled to all of the incidences of an operation meaning, you know, salaried employees, you know, certain types of benefits. You know, there's there's money changing hands there. It's strictly regulated as it should be by the federal government. But normally what you'll have is, you know, you'll have family members put on the payroll at very reasonable rates, you know, recorded, you know, to the tee. Well, if you look at a larger Foundation, like the called the Clinton Foundation called any past presidents Foundation, right, they can justify Large executive compensation plans, and larger payrolls and greater transportation costs and private speaking, you know, engagement fees to individuals who might be conflicted out because their organizations are so immense. Whereas, you know, let's say I have a smaller foundation that they want to put their two adult children on the payroll, they're going to have meetings with various charities to figure out which ones need to be donated to and, you know, all the other administrative work, which is real work. Well, that compensation is going to be scrutinized in a manner that probably doesn't meet the level of larger foundations, because larger foundations can say, Well, hey, look at look at this institution we've created, you know, this is like a regular business, and we need this. And that's not to say, you know, the, the big guys, you know, they're gonna fall under the magnifying glass of the of the IRS. But, you know, you still have to be very, very careful. And I think there's a, there's an inequity there, there's an inequity of you know, the smaller foundation that maybe maybe they had to incur $10,000 worth of travel costs in a year. And that seems out of the norm. And maybe, you know, maybe some IRS agent is going to take a look at that and say, I wonder what's going on there. Meanwhile, you look at these larger foundations, and what are their travel expenses going to be? I think that's the overall difference between the two. And again, there's so many other, you know, politically motivated corruptions that you can see with the larger institutions, I mean, you know, and it's been all over the news, you know, the pay to play type situation, or, hey, make a donate massive donation to my private foundation. And, you know, I'll have the State Department give you a favorable ruling or, you know, favorable, favorable treatment. Over here, you know, meanwhile, the smaller Foundation, you know, even thinks about contracting with a business that happens to be connected to one of the directors, you know, me as the attorney is going to start saying, Hey, you got a big problem. So it's, it's, it's very interesting, I do think the IRS recognizes that and they're trying to even the playing field. Obviously, you've seen a lot of private foundations in the news recently on both, you know, regardless of political affiliation, I think that you're going to start seeing a heck of a lot more that