I mean, in terms of style, I'll give it to you. She writes beautifully, but to me, it's style over substance, basically. I found this very flawed, and extremely detrimental to Moroccans. It is supposed to be a multi-voiced or multi-point-of-viewed novel, because it's not just about Mathilde, all the other characters are given a voice. So I was expecting to have a more of a balance. But I didn't find that. It was very much colonist's account of that period of the history of Morocco. It was even more painful for me because I am from the same city where all the events happened. I am from Meknes. So I knew every little street detail she talked about, I know it. I grew up there, even the school where Aïcha used to go, I used to borrow books from that school. It felt like okay, this is my city, this is my country. But the characters, no, I didn't identify with them. I didn't relate to them. And I didn't even like them, they didn't make sense to me. It was just too much for me in terms of clichés and stereotypes. Men are bloodthirsty, they're violent, they are ignorant. Women are sensual, but brainless. I mean, even the food – she hated on the food! I draw a line there. You can disparage Moroccan men as much as you like, I'll turn a blind eye, but Moroccan food, no, sorry, you can't do that. Leave Moroccan food alone, and Moroccan women as well, you know, women of that period in the 50s. They were so full of optimism, because they knew that there was a new wave. Something big is happening. We're going to get our independence and we're going to get our rights. And the way they are depicted in the book is just insulting. Because to me, it was insulting to my mum, my aunts who grew up in that period, who had huge, big dreams. They were supported by the brothers, their parents, their husbands. So it doesn't resonate with my Morocco, especially after that period.