Yeah. So this is just my personal stance. We can all agree to disagree or have other opinions or thoughts and ideas. Those are all welcomed here. But the trend, and this is just online, because this is where we see things, is really that SLPs don't have enough respect in the school or in a medical setting. We don't we don't get the respect that we deserve. We don't get the respect that our colleagues have. And my thought process here is we cannot have our cake and eat it too. So we are one of the only professions. We've talked about this over and over and over again that has something like the CCC, and if we want to be respected in the way that our colleagues are respected. We can't scream and shout that we don't want to pay $250 a year. But then ask for the CCC to save us when it's convenient for us. So we need to be all in or all out, and here at fix SLP, we are all out. So the CCC cannot be the thing that allows interstate portability. And when we first took a look at this, we thought, well, maybe they're doing this because they have signed into the interstate compact, and on the surface, that is probably part of this. They do not need a provisional license, really, if they're going to be in the interstate compact, because the interstate compact will allow for people living outside of the state of Texas to practice within the state of Texas through compact privileges. So that's a good thing. Where this becomes a problem is if you move to the state of Texas and it becomes your home state, the interstate compact has nothing to do with portability of the license if you change your home state. So if I'm living in Ohio, where we've signed in, and I want to do some teletherapy in Texas, or take a quick 13 week assignment out there, I can use my compact privileges to go practice in Texas. If they pass, they have not yet. It's legislation pending hasn't passed for the just letting go. They are. They're looking at it. It's pending, but they're not there yet. But in this hypothetical scenario, please continue. Okay, thank you for that correction. So maybe I take a 13 week assignment, and I love it, and I think I'm never leaving. I'm gonna stay here. I'm gonna make this my job. Now I need to apply for a permanent license in the state of Texas. My compact privileges via Ohio as my home state will no longer be good if I move my permanent residence to Texas, and that's where the issue arises. The compact isn't going to help me get a permanent license in Texas. I would need to apply as a new applicant. And so what this is saying is, as a new applicant, I can provide every single thing needed that they're asking for. And I should have to do that really. I can provide everything they're asking for, for the license, or just have my CCC. And again, that's where we propose that that should not be a thing. Yes, it is. It makes it convenient for us, but there are other ways that we can do this without having to lean into that CCC. Every single state has the same requirements, except for Hawaii and North Dakota. And last time I saw North Dakota was working on their problem. North Dakota's difference is that they don't require a nine month supervised experience after graduation. So that's a problem, but I think there was some moves to change that, and then Hawaii does not require continuing education. Hawaii has to get on that. Hawaii needs to deal with that. But other than that, in Washington, DC and every other state, the state requirements are equivalent to, or more difficult than the CCC. So if we want to have portability from state to state, we need to be writing that an equivalent state license would also allow for portability into the state, not the CCC, an equivalent state license. And I would say the word equivalent, because if you're worried about someone from Hawaii coming to Texas, I could support that Hawaii. Get your act together if you don't, if you want to have that portability, do what the rest of us are doing.