There's a lot in your question, so I'm going to unpack it one topic at a time. I'll start with the lawsuits. When a book is removed for unconstitutional reasons, absent a change of heart by the board members voting to remove the book, or absent a change in the membership of the board, the only way to vindicate the rights of the reader is to go to court. And we're aware of two lawsuits that are proceeding right now. The first is in Wentzville, Missouri; the ACLU of Missouri is representing a group of students and the Wentzville Missouri School District, and is suing the school district for removing six books from the school library shelves. The second lawsuit that we're aware of is a group of citizens in Llano County, Texas have sued. This is the county where the county commissioners cut off access to the entire eBook platform and removed about 100 books from the shelf based on the Krause list. And it's their intent, if they have to, to go all the way to the Supreme Court to vindicate their right to access books in the library and not have books censored based on the religious or political objections of a small group of people. So we'll see how those lawsuits proceed. But that is the endpoint, that's the final act you can take to try to stop censorship is to hold the government body accountable for the violation of civil rights and civil liberties. What's better is prevention and prevention starts, as I said earlier, with involvement in local politics. In the United States, we don't have a national book authority, the Library of Congress serves Congress, it doesn't serve the country. So we have to look to our local library boards or local school boards. And so it means being involved with what the board is doing, what it's deciding, being aware of who is being elected, participate in elections, vote, you know, and the ultimate act there is to run for school board and to run for library board, knowing that you'll be there to preserve everyone's freedom to read, but also advocacy. Elected officials are buying into this because they believe it's a winning issue at election time. And what we'd like to do is to convince them otherwise, that advancing this legislation is not good for their election prospects, that in fact, the majority of voters of all political persuasions disagree with censorship as a government tool for controlling thought. And that's what Unite Against Book Bans is all about. What we wanted to create was an opportunity for people from all political persuasions, from all backgrounds, members of the public, to come together in a grassroots effort to oppose book censorship in our schools and libraries, provide a point of mobilization for that majority that hasn't existed yet, come together locally, come together nationally, to make it clear that we won't stand for our government officials or government agencies telling us what to think, telling us what to read, that it's up to us to choose what we want to read. It's up to parents to guide their family's reading, but not to dictate what's available to the rest of the community. And that's what Unite Against Book Bans is all about. So right now, we're in the first phase of the campaign, going out to the world and asking individuals to sign up to cast their vote in favor of the freedom to read. We're also going to be introducing partners in this work, educational organizations, civil liberties organizations, and those most impacted by this: booksellers, publishers, as well. And to come together in a nonpartisan way on this one issue, which is censorship. Everyone can agree that censorship is a tool of totalitarian governments, and that we shouldn't be using that. We now have a toolkit available for individuals to use to oppose censorship. And we'll be creating more opportunities for individuals to make their voices heard and to reach out to elected officials, to library boards, and to school boards, go to UniteAgainstBookBans.org. And you'll find a wealth of materials to help you fight censorship.