Thank you very much. Just for the audience, a bit to know from which perspective I'm going further with questions as well, we have about 160 members, probably or 120 of them are civil society organizations. We are very much of a citizen center organization, and our mission is to empower citizens to assess the areas. Having said that, I think that the imbalance you were talking about, it's somehow embedded in European decision making process. It has always been part of the structure. No more consumer society organization makers because there is where the constituencies are. National ones are going for national ones and Europeans while robbing European decision making, decision makers. Of course, this is the reason why we have the networks. Because the UK scenario, we need to do that based on the input our members, efficient network, however. So this is the scheme in radio world, right? And it has been like that few some years ago, when the only issue we have been discussing was our representative networks. Are they really inclusive? Are they listening to their members, or they're just self sufficient, and so on and so forth. It was quite a decent debate. Still on the agenda. However, nowadays we live in much more complicated Manuel. Why is it complicated? Because also the power struggle, which is not again something new, the struggle, where capitals are often claiming that everything good that happens to their national citizens is produced by them. And then, if there are things which, of course, are not popular, and this is because Brussels were sold, this has always been part of the journey now, however, nowadays it's taking place at a much larger scale, and also is based sometimes on just au fear wise. To this constellation, if we add the MIS and misinformation which is polluting the political and the public sphere, that it can be a result, again, of a power struggle of putting forward different narratives based on life so even, and quite massively, by the way, put peace in Central and Eastern Europe as a result of the Russian proponent and Putin's narrative, then We are living in an environment whenever it's very difficult to understand what is what and how is how this, the whole result has been from this, those recent phenomenon, which has upscale to unbelievable levels, I would say, Is the influx of mistrust and distrust among the population, citizens and our constituencies, which of course, leads to confrontation and leads to fragmentation of societies. I believe that this is the real problem, of these balances Nowadays, everyone is target, and I can give plenty of examples, as I believe everyone can Bulgarian by Origin. Bulgaria is about to adopt, hopefully, the euro as the first of January. You can't imagine what kind of narratives are walking in the public space in Bulgaria, people. RG of course, is that on the line is going to steal the money from their bank accounts on their journey in Europe. Yesterday, the Bulgarian Parliament voted to set up a commission, a parliamentary commission, to investigate the work of Jos Soros in the Open Society Foundation, which I worked for 12 years guys before coming here supporting the European integration of Bulgaria from civic society perspective. So, I mean, so yes, what could be the response? So when you try to deal with this trust, I think the anti God is building trust, building and sustaining trust. And I believe a civil society organization. This is our first obligation, media obligation. We need to generate trust with everything we do, from the simple things being meticulous in what we do much more than before. So really putting forward narratives that are fair, that are true, that involve emotions we already know facts are not sufficient. Facts are important, but not sufficient. We need to learn this new game, because we need to fight mistrust and distract on a big scale. And then my second thought is about upscaling our intelligence. We can't do things effectively in silos. We are just not self sufficient, and this is the reason why it's only important to connect to each other, to upscale across communities, across borders, across sectors as well. I can give you two example, one if negative, one is positive. Note from our because he has launched a branch, its first time. Money branch actually in Bulgaria, with with the ambition, five years ago, to have really, really very targeted intervention in certain Eastern Europe which are from the region called the region there we have these 14 cross sectoral conditions for developing this information in the individual member states. So we did it, sorry, in check in Poland, from next year, we are connecting those conventions so that they can work cross region and why? Because the narratives are one and the same. They are one and the same. They easily upscale cross borders. And also the model that is used in order to put into operation, those narratives are also similar, so response can only be collected and also because she is also very vulnerable by they cannot fight again alone against this information. So they need allies. They need allies. They need support, which is European and transsectoral. So hopefully we will try to scale information within this and then on a positive note, because everything, hopefully is quite not yet. Maybe we will reach also this point, but not yet. Just another example. We are working quite a lot on digital democracy and digital transformation. So maybe you know that in last year's Commission asked, as part of the digital decade goals, member states to develop their digital roadmaps. They report to the commission based on these digital roadmaps, actually targets, and the Commission gives back some recommendations for improvement every two years. So we have developed methodology, and we have tested it this year in five counties. We want to ensure a constant civic monitoring of how those home NAS are implemented, what extent they are also relevant and adequate in order to achieve the digital goals, especially from the perspective. So next year, we're going to cover 10 countries, and our ambition is that by 2028 we are going to have a civic monitoring covering au YON member states, following Ond the same methodology, inputting in that way, civil society perspective to the Commission before they issue their monitoring reports, communicating at national level, and hopefully because also this is our role as a new organization of showing what works as I don't really like this word, good practice, but notice that what I mean the good examples. Thank you.