So in my case, I'm working currently on two projects: one theoretical and one empirical. A theoretical book on the comparative study of social media, together with a doctoral student Mora Matassi, where we argue for the triple comparative approach, comparisons across nations, comparisons across media and comparisons across platforms, because if we look at most of the work on social media, for the most part, the vast majority of studies have single country studies, and usually single countries within the Global North, which is where 13 to 14 percent of population lives. But you know, social media are used by 4.8 billion people on the planet, in all countries of the world. And it is very important that we have a sense of similarity, both for descriptive but also for touristic purposes. Likewise, the study of social media tends to isolate social media from the other media objects in our environment. So What we argue in this book is that in order to fully understand or to better understand how social media are developed, deployed, and used, we need to understand them as a comparison of across nations and regions, across different media forums, and across platforms. The other project is an empirical project that is part of a team led by my collaborator Eugenia Mitchelstein at Universidad de San Andres. It’s a project that tries to understand the reception of misinformation. There is a whole lot of work on how misinformation is produced, how it spreads, sort of how it's vitalized, but there is very little in comparison about how people make or don't make sense of misinformation, disinformation, fake news, etc. The book with MIT Press is he first sort of large- scale monograph about not only the research of misinformation, but also the reception of misinformation in the Global South, in a context in which in many countries also in that dilemma, not only in Latin America, but in Southeast Asia, or parts of Africa, where there is very high level of distrust already existing towards the media, that colors the reception in very different ways than how people approach the issue of misinformation, say in Scandinavia, or in the Netherlands or in Canada.