you. Thank you. Thank you so much. So it sounds like we are going to move forward today, and I just wanted to share to the residents of Detroit, first and foremost, my support for solar panels, for solar farms, for reducing our carbon footprint for renewable energy, I think is a serious thing. I think climate change is real, and I wholeheartedly support any efforts to reach our overall benchmarks and goals. I think the issue for me is how we achieve it. And you know, we just heard at the table today, blight crime, blight, crime, and, you know, contemplating back and forth if this really is an issue of how we address crime and blight, or how do we address the issue of renewable energy and climate change. And I think that there's a way to do both. There's a way to address it without violating our own zoning ordinances, reaching our benchmarks and addressing the issue of blight and crime in our community. So I just wanted to make sure that it's very clear how I vote today. First and foremost, I may have been supportive of it if more time was given, but the constant push and urgency and rushing when just out the admission of someone today stated that our zoning change could be done by September when we come back, which would have given us more time which, which would have allowed us to have our zoning changes in place, gave us the belt and suspenders that we needed. So I'm a little concerned about that extra urgency and push that raises a concern for me as well, too. I want our union brothers and sisters to know that I'm with them. I support unions. I support jobs that's never going to change again. Those same jobs could be available with this project was shifted somewhere else. We're in different areas of our city, so my vote today, again, really is for more time, because I'm not saying that I'm against this, but if, in fact, it will have to be a no. It's not against our union, it's not against workforce development, is not against renewable, renewable energy, because I support it. It is, again, for me, more time to digest this in the primary things for me, as as mentioned, it's preference, it's location. I agree with member Calloway, who is artic articulated in several times about the location being in rural, vacant industrial sites. LPD has noted that many comparable cities attempting to dedicate large areas of land have not been found that are zoned residential. Cities like Chicago, Cincinnati, Philadelphia, have all invested large scale solar farms that operate on rural land outside of city limits. Cities like Baltimore Grand Rapids are seeking to locate farms, solar farms on landfills. Cities like Chicago and Cincinnati are engaged in large scale projects that will provide for solar power located outside of the city limits. I still believe that if they were shifted somewhere else, outside of the residential neighborhoods, that community benefits could have been negotiated with both light star and DTE. So that argument, to me, is not valid. I think that that could still have been negotiated. We could identify disenfranchised, low income areas that needed support and still provided those benefits without locating the solar farms right in that area. I still believe that we have not studied or explored scenarios or policies that represent a different path to reducing our carbon footprint through solar panels or green roofs on newly constructed or current buildings. Community Solar is big for me, right? And I know this was discussed as well in committee the ability for the energy created to provide energy to homes, to individual individuals throughout the city of Detroit, and have access to the energy that is produced. It was very unfortunate to hear that DTE has lobbied against Senate bills that would allow community solar to be legal. That was very disappointing to hear. I have not heard a commitment from DTE, either verbally or in writing, that you will support community solar moving forward, one can only surmise that DTE did so because community solar would decrease their profit and benefit residents and start contrast this proposal increases, of course, DTS bottom line which that information has been submitted, and again, it seems that DTE in these other companies are benefiting a lot more zoning. Zoning is big for me. I know much a lot cannot be disclosed regarding the city's violating our own zoning ordinance, but it has been talked here a lot at the table about process, process, process, and today we will be moving forward violating our own ordinance. And that is, that is that's important to me, and we just laid out a process to fix it. We just laid out a process to fix it, which is just mind boggling to me, that we have a process. Our corporation Council has agreed with the process, but we still want to rush it through September 9. I think someone said the changes will be before us, but we still want to violate our own ordinance when our own attorneys have told us several times that litigation, it's not if it happens is when, and that is imminent, it is forthcoming. So I believe that we have, we should have the necessary protections, and that is making sure that we change our zoning ordinance and do that prior to voting on this. Lastly, I wanted to mention just priorities. So we recently hosted an event in the city of Detroit, a housing Summit. And what comes to me is the continued need, and we hear this all the time about housing in Detroit, the mothers, the children that we've turned away for housing. And I know it doesn't have to be one or the other, but as I mentioned before, there seems to be a way that we can still build housing, incentivize it, while also addressing the issue of renewable energy and climate change by building solar panels and green roofs on top. And so for me, I struggle just with the issue of priorities, where we have a huge issue of housing in the city of Detroit, in a recent response by the administration to one of my questions, they stated that 850 homes could be produced on the land needed for the proposed solar farms. 850 homes could go there and guess what? We could put the homes there and create the solar panels or the green roofs incentivize that on top. So that's also a concern for me. I think it sets a bad precedent to promise upgrades to residents, to negotiate and to make agreements before it has been implemented by by council. It seems like a lot of deals were reached and made prior to this coming before Council, and I have a concern with that as well, too. Lastly, I'll just say one other thing. I did have the opportunity to go out to one of the solar farm areas, and I may, have, you know, possibly went over and said, Yes, you know, been drawn to support this little bit more, given more time, I'm not saying maybe phase two, I may come around. But allowing that time to be able to drive and see these areas, I think, also is very important to me. So with that being said, I just wanted to state publicly where I am so that people can know why I'm voting the way I vote today. I think more time may have allowed me to maybe move more to the affirmative, to negotiate more, to get more, see more commitments around community solar from DTE, which I think is extremely important, have not heard that to date. So just wanted to say that for the record in one of the residents of Detroit to know where I stand, because I don't want it to be misunderstood at all that council president Sheffield does not support solar panels or solar energy or renewable energy, because council president Sheffield does. It's just how we achieve it, and we can disagree on how that's okay. I think that's what this process is about how we achieve it, and I'm not quite there yet on this being the solution, especially when there's ways to achieve it without violating our own ordinances and using eminent domain. So thank you so much. So with that being said, member duha, if you would like to move the court,