theoretical long term plan. Yes, it's more than that, because we were planning to, you know, to purchase every year from a definitive nature eight, but really taking a step back. It's, it's now, you know, making sure that we don't get over our skis. What? What is our annual budget allocation? We this is our allocation every year for busses. We have a long term asset plan and management plan for the busses that we have. So we have to be thoughtful in making sure that we don't, you know, spend three, 3x a diesel on electric, and we don't have the corresponding infrastructure. We don't have the corresponding, you know, tax credit or rebate or or grant funds that are there. And so what we've decided is especially based upon when the new administration's bill passed in July, we just said, Okay, let's stop now and let this come through the system and we figure out what it is. We've heard everything from the firm, from never again Can we do it and to we just need to figure out the way to finance it and to do it, or nothing has changed. So we've heard all of it, so we'd like, Okay, let's stop and actually think through how we want to approach this. And what that looks like is even with, you know, our drive for electric bus infrastructure and acquisition of more busses, we were also looking at other alternative options as well. So propane to diversify the biofuels is something else that so we had always had that approach. It allowed us to not stop, but to reallocate the resources as appropriate right now, until we get more certainty on the EV framework, so to speak, just writ large, regardless of busses or whatever, just just all of it, there's a lot of confusion and where people are going. But then on the budget side, yes, it's had an impact. From a standpoint, we have some stakeholders, as you can imagine, that are like, Nope, we, we said it. We should just go. We should go. But it's, it's, it's one of those that's where, like, well, that's great, but in four years, you all may be the same folks saying, why do we waste this money if we did not have X, Y and Z in place, or we didn't know for sure, or or there was the there was the possibility that this program would end. Why do we keep going? So it's always that balance that's necessary. But no, it has the grant money and the rebates were a incredible and necessary carrot to kit, to get folks moving and to to to move with some urgency on our part, because that was necessary. That's the point of those programs, of course. But not having that now requires us to to ensure that, okay, let's make sure our infrastructure is in place, because it's hard to defeat making these purchases if we don't have the adequate infrastructure in the first place, from the electrification and the infrastructure part, that's why we're looking at alternative financing. What are options that we have? Are there places where we can monetize and then pay for it ourselves? Because we are committed to continuing the work, we just want to be fiscally responsible with. How we proceed, recognizing that, you know, budgets are finite, and unfortunately, most cases are decreasing in some categories,