Yeah, the one thing I didn't quite get was this thing that you said, from sir Jim rose. I didn't fully get what I was saying he was part of it. So he's not saying this. He's He's, he's definitely all into dyslexia. But there is a, a thread that of of experts in childhood education, psychology childhood cognition, who, who suspect that there's no such thing as dyslexia, really, that those earliest neurologists, in ophthalmologists and doctors who, who named it and made it a thing were wrong. And that really, an inability to read transcends any level of intelligence. It's disconnected from intelligence, that no matter whether you are of high intelligence or low intelligence, you can suffer from an inability to learn to read, right. And so if you have dyslexia, and you are of high intelligence, the kid next to you, who has low intelligence and can't read also has dyslexia or theirs, or else no one has dyslexia is just an inability learned read. Most experts say dyslexia is a thing. Sure. Which means then the debate is, okay. Does it have anything to do with intelligence, right? And if it doesn't have anything to do with intelligence, then all of these resources that are being diverted to these kids who are of high intelligence, but are having trouble learning to read, is really doing a disservice to the kids of low intelligence, and I'm making air quotes here, everybody. Yeah. Who are having trouble learning to read? Gotcha. But there's why differentiate you're both having trouble learning to read write, start attacking the problem with both of them, right? Is this one Australian expert, who basically said, like, yes, dyslexia is a thing it is his own thing has a neurobiological basis. It's not made up. It's not a myth. But let's treat first and then diagnose later, right? If you see an inability to learn to read, go after that. Don't say, Well, is it dyslexia let's test the kids intelligence. It doesn't matter. Try and focus on learning how I'm teaching them how to read interest, and apparently interventions. There's this guy named Julian, Professor Julian. What's his name? Chuck? linen. Sans? Yes, Julian sands in boxing Alayna. He makes he has a big soliloquy about whether or not dyslexia is I can't remember the guy's last name. But I get the impression that parents of children with dyslexia are not a big fan of this guy. Right. But he's he's basically said we're diverting a lot of funding away from kids who know how to who don't know how to read, just because they don't they supposedly don't have a high IQ, right. Let's treat all the kids. So that's the idea of whether it's a myth, not that dyslexia doesn't exist, although I think some people suspected it didn't for a while right now, people believe it does. But not necessarily that it's just intelligent, upper middle class kids who have dyslexia, right. It's just an inability to read for the same reason. Interesting. That's the basis of it. It's still up in the air. And it's a really touchy subject. Yeah. very touchy subject. Sure. and rightfully so. Yeah. Like, I can imagine you feel lost in the woods. If there's no official diagnosis. There's no official test of it. There's no official definition of it. But your kid has it. And you know, your kid has it. Yeah. I can't imagine what it must feel like to have some expert going like there's no such thing as dyslexia. Right? You know, yeah, yeah. Thanks a lot. It is very touchy, and rightfully so. Well, finally,