Yeah, so they Well, the other part is the Yeah, the cognitive empathy. What I'm seeing there that sort of the category, the phenomenon that's under, under that, under that the heading is, one is understanding that you're sort of understanding, and it's not really explained how that understanding happens. The second is that it is that you're sort of imagining your perspective, taking your imagining so it has an it has sort of a an imaginative quality to it. And then there's a third category that's often talked about in that model, is empathic concern, is that you through all these different, you know, cognitive and affective empathy, that you have concern for the person, and then the compassion community sort of takes it off into then it becomes compassion, or something like that, or empathic concern. And that's also sort of, I see that as sort of reaction, a bit like affective it comes under the effective model. So it gets very confusing. And I just find that the the the confusion is really hindering effective progress in like, I'm trying to build an empathy movement, you know, and to make mutual empathy, you know, a, you know, a shared cultural value. And with all this confusion, it's like people don't know it, you know what? I don't know what people are talking about, you know? So that maybe I just quickly share the model that I've been working on. So I've got empathy. I call it holistic empathy, and it's empathy is sort of a basic empathy of me just listening to you, like Carl Rogers would do, I'm sensing, you know, I'm seeing you're agreeing. I see you know, you're smiling. I said, I sense who you are, and it's and it's both. And I throw out the affective cognitive dichotomy. You know, it's just you're sensing into someone's experience. And, you know, I can maybe you're happy, maybe you're sad, and I sense, oh, you're I sense your happiness, and I just, we do active listening, so we listen to you and maybe reflect back what you're saying, and then you would share more like, just like Carl Rogers would do. And that basic empathy is just, is just kind of foundational empathy, you know, that Carl Rogers would would had written about then having that we can sense into our own experience, you know, with self empathy. And I will calling that self empathy. And Carl Rogers, did you know, sort of hinted at that, saying that if you listen to someone that actually supports them and sensing into their own experience as well, you know. So if you're in a clinical setting, the doctor listening to the patient, and, you know, maybe empathically or actively listening, that the patient is actually given space to sense deeper into their own experience and share more, maybe about what there's their medical situation is, and then, so that I call that sense. Self empathy, and then the imaginative empathy is sort of splitting out the imaginative part that maybe comes under the perspective taking and and and and imaginative components of cognitive empathy. And it's a different phenomenon. It's more that I'm sort of imagining like an actor. I'm imagining, you know, what your situation is, and I can be right or wrong, you know, good, and sometimes that turns into projection. I project that on to you, and, you know, can be inaccurate. So to really have a difference between those two different phenomenon and then going into, into what I call the holistic empathy, is like, if you're in a hospital or in a setting that it the level of empathy between all the participants, right between all the people in that setting, there's a sort of A level of the aggregated empathy. And you can, you go into an environment, and it can be very empathic. People are very sensitive, you know, to everyone else, there's a sense of connection where you go into another setting, and, you know, if everybody's aggressive, and you know, you can just feel the difference in a group. So that's sort of the holistic model, and just wondering, kind of your take on on that model?