Okay, so the GALILEO project is basically the, the scope of it is trying to establish the study of unidentified objects whose nature is not known in our atmosphere, to study it scientifically, meaning to collect evidence, using instruments that we have full control over. So, for example, past the testimonies, you know, do not stand up to the scrutiny of size, you can try the scientific paper based on what people tell, you can say this person said that and submit the paper for publication, that's not acceptable. What you need is to rely on instruments that collect the quantitative evidence. And so that's point number one. The second is the instruments that were used in the past on reports on unidentified objects. Were not optimized for that purpose. They were, for example, a jittery camera in the cockpit of a fighter jet. I mean, that's not a scientific experiment, because you don't know exactly how the fighter jet maneuver. And you don't know what kind of jitters were introduced to the camera and during that flight, and what you want is to have full control and full knowledge of your experimental setup. And that's what the GALILEO project wants to do. We want to we don't want to look back at past evidence. In fact, we say that explicitly on our website. Also, the other thing that I should say, we don't want to entertain explanations that deviate from the known laws of physics. So if someone says, Oh, actually, you know, there is something really strange going on that violates the standard model of physics. We will not entertain that we will use our knowledge. Just like in a regular scientific experiment. Of course, if we are pushed to the point where the evidence is so unusual that they You can say for sure that then our understanding of physics is violated, you know, that would be worth a Nobel Prize, of course. And I find it unlikely because there are so many experiments that we've tested the current understanding of the laws of physics that I would really find it surprising if these objects violate. So at first, we will use the what we know about physics, the laws of nature, and then not deviate from that and then collect the smart data is possible using a telescopes connected to cameras that feed the data into computer systems that filter it for objects of interest. And I should say, I mean, people would ask, okay, what's new about it? You know, we have telescopes operated by astronomers looking at the sky all the time? Well, the answer is, if a bird flies above a telescope that astronomers are using, they just ignore it, we will look at it and see that it's appeared and identified, we will try to get a high resolution image just to give you a sense, an object, the size of a person, at a distance of a mile, can be resolved with a megapixel image so that you can see the size of the head of a pin on it using a one meter telescope, and just standard optics. And then, you know, in a few weeks ago, I looked online, and you can actually purchase such a telescope, but you just add it to your bag, there is a button, add to the bag, it costs half a million dollars, that's a lot of money. But apparently there are people willing to spend that. So the point is, with a big enough telescope, you can tell whether an object the size of a person has a label saying made in China made in Russia, or made on exoplanet x, you know, and that's what we will do. Now, I should tell you that I'm not interested at all, in anything that is human made, you know, if it says made in China, or made in Russia, you know, that's very boring. As far as I'm concerned, I will transfer all the information to Washington, DC, whoever wants it? I don't, you know, the project is not about that. We don't care about that kind of objects. The two, the two types that are of interest are, of course, atmospheric phenomena, you know, things that happen in nature, were unexpected, and produce interesting events that were previously unappreciated. You know, that's why their nature is not known in the UNDP. Report to Congress. So that's one possibility. And of course, there is a possibility that something out of this earth came nearby. So I mean, we are completely agnostic, without any agenda, just trying to collect the data. And, and the good thing is, you know, that we are funded by donation, so I did not fundraise. I just got not 1 million, but 2 million, nearly $2 million over the past few weeks, from donors that I've never met before until the last few weeks. And, and they just decided to support that research. And I said at that point, I said, Okay, well, I can assemble exceptional scientists, mostly astronomers that know how to construct telescopes that will serve the purpose that we need them for. And you might ask, why not use satellite data, you know that there was some satellite data looking down, while satellites move around the Earth very quickly, they can't really monitor the motion of a given object in the way that we wanted. And so I was asked by many people, why not use existing data? The point is, existing data was never designed for the purpose that we're talking about. This is really a new endeavor. And no, and the reason it was not done in the past is very simple. Sorry, the science community scientists ridiculed this subject, and didn't take it seriously. At the same time, there were people out there making statements that do not make much sense, including statements about violating the laws of physics, you know, and then, and then the scientists said, you see that there is no point in us getting engaged, because it makes no sense. So the two communities basically created the status quo, where not much was done. And then when the report came to Congress, at that point, it looked to me as if it's, you know, it's very intriguing for us to look into it because former CIA directors Brennan, and Woolsey would say this is a serious matter. Former President Barack Obama said, this is a serious matter. These are real objects. So if the politicians in Washington DC, you know, and military personnel say they don't understand the nature of some objects that appear to be real, at that point in time, I say, let's move this subject away from the talking points of politicians, military personnel to the realm of science, so that we can clear up the fog and resolve it once and for all you know, this is a subject we are not in the dark ages, right? So we there isn't it we shouldn't speculate we can clear it up with an investment of a few 10s of millions of dollars and we can talk about why I need more money in order to do it properly. But the point is we can clear up this this fog and and find the answer and then move on, you know, if it ends up being a natural phenomena, so be it, I have no agenda.