Yeah. So first of all, we recognize that obviously our academic system needs fixed. That is the deepest route. We cannot do that. We can take that on in a later time. There are ideas for that, but we are not in a position right now with time, energy or money to take that on. That is a in five to 10 year from now. Plan. So what can we do today? Right now, we have chosen not to initiate a petition, because we know that that is words, not action. We need actionable steps. So the very first piece of this, and I'm very hopeful, by the time you are hearing this, we have already launched it, and you have already seen it on the internet. Because when you hear this, I'm laying on the beach in Florida, and I don't want to be writing letters to CMS. I'm leaving in 24 hours. In 24 hours, my team better get there together. Step one is we are going to ask all of you individually to reach out to CMS. We feel there is a much bigger impact there than a document of look. Electronic Signatures transferred in a file to CMS that doesn't make an impact. When they hear from you, the stakeholders, especially those of you who are losing your jobs, are about to lose their jobs, or afraid they're not going to get a job down the road, you have stories. If you are a supporter of fix SLP, and your family or loved one is being impacted by this. This is not just an SLP issue. This is now an access to care issue. If you are an employer who now has a problem filling a job because you're just not comfortable taking on the risk right now, and you've furloughed or laid off, or, I hope not fired, people are saying they're getting fired, in my hope it would be a layoff, but if you've had to let someone go, CMS needs to hear from you. They need to hear from the stakeholders who have boots on the ground and are being deeply impacted by this decision, a typed out signature with a state attached to it on a document does not hit the hearts. So we need people to send a hard copy to CMS. We are going to blitz them from all over this country, at every angle, and I'm really hopeful that our social media folks who aren't in SLP, but are adjacent, will share too, our OT friends, our PT, friends that know and see what's going on. We need everyone to send these letters. That's thing number one. And we're going to ask for a two year extension. We are not going to ask for a reinstatement. That is what ASHA is doing. This is my opinion only. I am sure my team agrees, but ASHA is going to submit that petition, and if they happen to be successful, which we don't think they will be, they're going to wash their hands of this problem and move on. They're going to count it as a win. They're going to move on. And you know what? The tower is going to crumble again. When this happens again, we just stand on the carousel and go around and around and the problem never gets fixed. So a reinstatement is a dangerous idea. Relying on the people who caused the problem in the first place to fix this is a bad idea. If we want to take our autonomy back, we have to go take it ourselves. So a two year extension seems reasonable. In some states, it could take more than that, especially if you've got legislators that are squirrely, or people on your state board who are Asha fans, it could, could be harder. But someone said, Oh, it took eight years for us to get a provisional license in. Pa, you think you can do this in two years? And yeah, naively, we think we can. And here's why, we are not putting in a new license. We are not putting in a new policy or procedure. Well, we are, but what we want to do is take the existing framework of the provisional license and the existing framework of the state license and mesh it together. So number one, maybe you rewrite what your your provisional period looks like, because we know there are a lot of issues with mentorship in this field, a lot of issues. It's time to write those wrongs. This is our chance. This sucks. What's happening, but this is a temporary problem to a solution that we we are going to change decades of jobs for speech language pathologists, if we can pull together and do this right. So fix your issues in the state with mentorship. Let's put it in the first year, or the first two years of licensure in your state. And instead of saying you take professional development or continuing education hours, we can call it something like your collaborative continuing education. That's it. You do what you're already doing in the first cycle, clean up the mess, fix the problems, maybe make more face to face visits or whatever. But then you this, the infrastructure is already there for reporting it. The infrastructure is already there for registering with your state. It's already there so you graduate, you get a full license, and you do these collaborative continuing education hours in the first cycle, or if they want to make that first year, then the first year, you do collaborative continuing education hours, and then you enter a regular two year cycle and do your CEUs. That seems like the simplest thing. We don't have to agree. And I think there's going to be a lot of disagreement over this, but personally, I don't think that mentorship should go away because of what we said at the top of this episode, as it relates to hours and people really needing guidance when they leave school.