Yeah, sorry, exactly No, and that's good point. I mean, it's, it's a lot of we were learning what we don't know as we go and yeah, just say that to say I'm not, I'm not smart enough to make any broad predictions or about about what is going to happen, but in terms of Arizona after The election, so yeah, briefly run through the article, and obviously run through the election results, which everyone knows, but at the top, spoke about Gallegos win and his of all of the candidates covered in these races, he has the most articulated positions on broadband and has endorsements to follow it. I think he has endorsements from several labor unions. The IBEW is one of them, and they cite his support and authorship of some broadband provisions in the bead or in the IJ and and other programs, as you know, part of their the reason why they support him other areas where, particularly the Democrats made a. Big part of all of their campaigns in Arizona, I think, was voicing support for tribal investment in broadband. All the candidates I covered especially well, especially Gallego and Jonathan Nez, who was cranes challenger in the second district, made large appeals to thanking and praising the investments of the i, j A in travel, broadband, and, you know, advocating for more. And I think that is a strong, a strong, strong position where you know, some other areas you know, candidates have not made as a clear declarations in terms of the Republican Party. I think we saw this across many states where in especially in House races, where candidates were jumping on some of the more high profile members of the party, their messages attacking the bead and de programs, Ted Cruz, obviously making Many of those tax and the FCC commissioner as well, making some of the or not the commissioner, excuse me, the result, I think, of of those attacks, is yet to be seen. We drew Garner and Kevin tagling have been covering Ted Cruz's letters to NTIA extensively, and are doing a lot of work on understanding what that's going to mean. But it seems especially, especially in Arizona, the House districts covered in this article, they were on board with with those statements, and those members, being Schweickart and siskimami and crane all in various statements, whether it be on X or formal campaign releases attacking the bead and de investments, Schweikert actually probably had the most interesting criticism of the bead program going as far to argue for satellite based Wi Fi mesh networks, which was a new Proposal. He did this on the House floor in September, arguing that bead networks are over subsidizing rural areas, and that satellite services like Starlink could be used to feed receivers and then move that signal through. Know what we would typically think of as like a rural or an urban network, mesh network, to do the same in a rural area from low Earth orbit satellites, and obviously much in representative schweikers opinion, that would be much cheaper than the bead program. Finally, in the second district, which I've hinted at, the upset of Jonathan Nez was avoided by Eli crane. Second District, I think was really interesting. And I'm glad that it was pointed out that it was a closer race than I had initially seen, because it's, you know, massive, the largest in Arizona, going all the way down south of Phoenix, all the way to the northern most parts of the state, which are obviously most rural parts of the state. And I think there's a large going back to the tribal investment piece, there's kind of a large discrepancy in the the views of representative crane and Jonathan nez. Nez making history as the first Native American congressional candidate to advance past the primaries for a house challenger. He made many statements and about his striving for improved infrastructure on tribal lands where Eli crane is far less inclined to make the same the same statements, far less inclined to advocate for infrastructure investments in rural areas and on tribal regions. Like I said, the future of the bead program. Think will largely depend on the choices that these newly elected members make, and if the administration, with what we're hearing, is going to actually take steps to try and claw back or make any sort of changes for states to change the ways that they're planning to implement funding. But in Arizona, in the house, it seems that those concerns and positions are they have won out in the in the close races, the toss up races in the state, whereas Ruben Gallego is the main detractor in this article from those from those positions. And I would just if welcome any questions or takeaways from this that people think I missed, misrepresented things that need to be added, like last time I was really, really pleased with the input that I