Yeah, so I'm glad to see that Dr. Bloom deleted that figure too, because, I mean, I felt that was one of the things that was really totally inappropriate with that, that preprint in, in some ways, so first of all, the authors were Chinese. So you're using a, an example of a, you know, a removal of a sequence arguably related very closely to the origins of SARS Coby to and, and the only reason that example existed was because of this Freedom of Information Act request, clearly political in nature. And, you know, to include that, in a what, substantively a scientific paper, I think that those are the types of things that scientists need to avoid. I mean, you know, science and politics don't really mix and we want to try to look at the data, you know, that's available, but, you know, put something in that, you know, that, you know, I mean, just points to, you know, Chinese is covering up and doing all these things, which, you know, it's the Chinese government has not been totally open about, about the pandemic, there's a lot of things out there that we would like to know, and that that hasn't been described, but, you know, to really hanging on some scientists that didn't have anything to do with this paper that he's, you know, making a case they, you know, pulled the data and, you know, that kind of thing. I thought that was one thing that was totally inappropriate.