now? So let me, let me actually give you a couple quickly. Some are just simple and obvious, which is the importance of symbols. In the anti Vietnam War, we were so alienated and so angry that we ended up marching under the flags of our enemies in Vietnam, the National Liberation Front of the Viet Cong we should always have been marching under American flags and only American flags. So that's that's kind of obvious, and I'm glad that today's activists, I think, understand that the larger question, though, is always about strategy. So I look back on the anti war movement, and I look back on myself, and we never really engaged the question of, how does the war end? We had demands, right, immediate withdrawal, blah, blah, blah, stop the bombing. But we didn't think, okay, strategically. And we had slogans like, bring the war home. Well, that's not a strategy. And I think at a certain point, particularly in the critical years 6869 we we failed to really develop a serious strategy. We thought somehow that ever increasing disruption in and of itself would end the war, and particularly in 68 which was a just an amazing year. It was a year of such hope and such tragedy, and, you know, amazing protests that rocked country after country after country, but also incredible repression. We made a critical mistake so Johnson won't run. Martin Luther King is killed. Bobby Kennedy is killed. We end up with an election between Nixon and Humphrey. Humphrey really won't break with the war, and he staggers out of the Democratic convention with those large and disruptive anti war demonstrations, a just a unhappy, miserable campaigner who couldn't offer a vision to the young that sound familiar at all, and and so we, we didn't support him at all, and his opposition was Richard Nixon, a insecure, bitter, aggrieved politician who had no respect for the Constitution of the United States. Now it turned into one of the very closest elections in our history. It was decided by fractions of a percentage point in various key states. We didn't participate. We said, vote with your feet. Vote in the street. Now the voting age was 21 in those days, so many people of our organizations wouldn't have been able to vote, but we had a lot of 21 year olds and 22 year olds, and we told them, Don't vote. Sit out this election. It's not that we were wrong about Humphrey. It's not that we were wrong about the state of American politics. It's that we had a profound failure of imagination of what it would mean to have Richard Nixon in the White House, and what it would mean for black and. Americans, what it would mean for the direction of our politics. It was Nixon who started the Republicans on the path to become the party of white creeence, to become the party, eventually, of Donald Trump. We could have beaten that, and I'm not saying we wouldn't have fought a lot with Humphrey. We would have fought with Humphrey if he was in the White House, but we probably would have won, whereas with Nixon, you know, we did have an impact. We stopped Nixon and Kissinger. They were seriously contemplating using nuclear weapons in Vietnam. It's now been documented from their papers, and they stopped because of the strength of the anti war movement, that's what held them back. So we did that, but we also they inflicted more years of death and horror in Southeast Asia that I think Humphrey wouldn't have I think we'd have stopped Humphrey, and we would have had peace significantly earlier. And part of it was we couldn't hold in our minds the need to protest and the needs to the need to win electorally, it seemed like they were in opposition. And I think younger activists today are better on that at least. I hope they are. Some were not, you know, I think, I think the Gaza folks were very much in our mindset. But so those are some of the mistakes that we made. I could go on and on. You know, we had to learn. We had a slogan that will sound very familiar to some people, there are no leaders here, which is hogwash. There are always leaders. And the question is, do you have good leadership? Do you have accountable leadership? Do you have Democratic leadership, or do you have bad leadership? And the notion there are no leaders here obscures those questions, and you never answer them. And so it's very hard to have really good leadership that empowers others, that teaches others and that builds collective responsibility and accountability. So there were, there were all of those. And part of it was we were just so young, and chronologically young, politically, and the pressure was so great. You know, it really was all on our shoulders to stop that horrible or Wow.