The respect of the feminine in the hierarchy of respect before and in compliment to the respect solely of the masculine. This is much more difficult to achieve than solely the respect or acting out of the traditional masculine values

4:12PM Mar 8, 2021

Speakers:

Name

Keywords:

masculine

people

disease

feminine

reality

ego

men

human

create

destroy

respect

science

understand

marriage

dictator

society

control

express

realize

analogy

Got a fucking blob one more time. Because when you listen to music and when you get high, it's the same thing, you abandon your assumptions and you don't, you just don't take anything for granted. And you you, you feel, and you don't question the feeling you you explore the feeling, but you don't question it. And, and so music touches into this base reality where, where sound waves and electronics and the speed of sound, and all of these things come together to produce a biochemical reaction in our brains, that we don't control. And we don't understand and we don't need to, because it just does. And so this is not. This is not to say that God is real. This is not to say that religion is true. But the fact that we just act as atheists or agnostics, or whoever, that there isn't something more magical to this, to this reality that we we encompass, and that encompasses us is just foolish. There is an underlying reality to all of this that's almost not touchable with words except by the most proficient in the language. And the storytellers and the artists, and they touch it first, and then it's expressed, through through, perhaps philosophy, and then perhaps through science, but maybe that never even happens. Because this whole thing is cyclical as, as we approach the ability to do so or perhaps like the, the information can travel fast enough in order to proliferate the consciousness of, of the masses, we destroy ourselves and we cut each other down. I think that's due to the predominantly masculine in, in the canon, the masculine oversight of the candidate, but it sound until that we realize that, that the feminine and the understanding of of it all. And then the ability to respect the feminine, above our respect for the masculine, or maybe put it differently, only to respect the masculine and so far as the masculine can respect to feminine, then we tie into a deeper level of reality, we tie into a deeper understanding of ourselves, and return to a deeper understanding of each other. And we achieve peace, not not peace, completely away from bickering with each other and arguing with each other and being catty with each other and perhaps a little underhanded. But, like you see in the reality shows, but when was the last time you saw a table of women, on, on. on, you know, the real housewives, when was the last time you saw them arranging for the murder of other people, or for the domination of one race over another race or when was the last time you saw a female dictator. And you've never seen that not only because you've never seen a woman truly in power. But it's because that's not feminine, that's very masculine, and it's the ego, and the woman doesn't the feminine doesn't express the ego in the same way as the masculine does. And so if we embrace the respect of the feminine, and put the respect of the feminine, above the soul, respect of the masculine and you combine those two, then you create a society that's not I wouldn't call it unstoppable because who's to say, but it will certainly be more robust than I mean, just think about this fucking nature does your big dummies like nature comes together and brings the masculine the feminine, and look how much masculine there is in the reproduction of the race. Look how much Look at that, look at look at the amount of effort or just make it scientific look at the amount of energy exerted by the masculine compared to the energy exerted by the feminine in terms of calories burned over the time of the raising of the child. And until their until the the until the earth has gone around the Sun 15 times or 18 times or 21 times or pick some arbitrary number. And the amount of energy expended by the feminine will be exorbitantly higher exponentially higher than the energy expended by expounded by the masculine. And yet the masculine is the one that decides in our current canon, the laws and the rules and the and everything and that's preposterous. So we are so we are so counter, it's not false. It's not it's not a sense of true or false, but it is.

It is it is certainly counter to nature. And so insofar as we counter nature, we become unnatural and as far As we can go in an unnatural state is about where we are right now because we're about to destroy ourselves, or at least that's certainly the the impending Zeitgeist, we have nuclear weapons, we have all this stuff. And so either we're going to do one of two things, we're going to destroy yourself, or we're going to become stronger. Because the rate at which, in any day any individual person can destroy the entire race is coming closer and closer to one to the entire race, as we develop nuclear weapons, and as countries become more and more corrupt, and it's because politics becomes more and more controversial. Controversial is not the word right word, I'm in complicated. We're either going to do it or not. I mean, it's coming to the point in an argument in the analogy as in the, in the argument with your wife, you guys are just about to walk out on each other. And if you don't, you realize that the marriage is more important than the ego. So the merged and this doesn't have to do strictly with masculine and feminine, but it's the only thing I can understand. So eventually, this goes through a gradient over time as, as, as we become more accepting of homosexuality and transsexuality and pansexuality, and bio sexuality, and tech, sexuality, and all these, these different expressions of this thing that we don't really understand. And that's what we're seeing in the current culture, we can expand on that more. But right now, the, the marriage of two people is, is the implicit agreement, or explicit agreement, that the sum of the egos the super hot, the super ego, and I don't know the words well enough, but something like that is more important than the individual ego, and nobody actually acts like that. But that's the implicit understanding. And the successful marriage is the one where your combined ego is more important than either individual ego, and where you can both keep yourself in check. In, in that, in that area, you don't let the other person act as if their ego is more important than the combined ego. And that means sacrifice. Because, because of almost by definition, because the ego is that which does not want to sacrifice. So in order to sack to compromise, in order, yeah, in order to reach a compromise, there must be a sacrifice of the ego. And since the ego does not want to be sacrificed, this is something that's counter to human nature. But that is very important in maintaining a

a

successful marriage. And a successful marriage is the thing that will free can't speak to the feminine, but will free the masculine or it will allow the masculine to be most free, because in order to feel the utmost freedom, it's not money that you need, it's not power that you need, it's love. So it's love, but it's also the other things, it's not just one thing, it's the combination of love, and control, and all the things that masculine ego desires. Just name them, I mean, what if you if you can't name him, then just look at the history books, because the history books tell you everything you need

the respect of the feminine, feminine,

in the hierarchy of respect, before and in compliment to the respect solely of the masculine. This is much harder, much more difficult

to achieve than solely the respect of the respect or the respect or acting out of the traditional masculine values. Okay, and this could definitely relate to Adam and Eve and the Genesis story and all this, I'm sure multiple other places but so just yeah, just look at the history books and it'll tell you that the dict men want to be dictators. Men want to be President's Men want to be vice presidents. Men want to be CEOs. Men want to control men want to men want to plunder men. One, two All right, we don't even have to say one two, we say the the, the tendency for men to want to perform these actions outweighs the tendency for men to want to stop other men from carrying these actions out. So so in that way, the the dictator overpowers the, the one, the single dictator overpowers the entire population, the dissent is, is quenched because the other men aren't powerful enough to stand up, or I'm brave enough to stand up and there's a lack of, there's a lack of braveness. And there's a lack of intelligence, and there's a lack of power on the part of the individual masculine. To prevent these things from happening, they're ridiculous, nobody wants to be dictated. Just look at them, then you bring it back to the marriage, the marriage is a an example of in the comedy touches on this, the marriage is an example of the litmus test of the degree to which a man wants to be controlled. And so it's obvious that a man doesn't want to be controlled. And yet demand allows themselves on a on a on a macro scale to be controlled, well on a micro scale, doesn't have enough energy to I don't know how to put that. But

there's, there's something there, I just have to figure out how to untangle that not.

So anyway, that's the new, that could be the new plan, that could be the new aim. And as you change that aim to respect to respect the max masculine respecting the feminine is to almost have the snake eating its own tail, and you keep things in check. If you don't have that things go out of check. And you have, you have the banking, you have the financial sector that we have now. And you have the military industrial complex that you have now. And you have the private banks, and you have the government all in cahoots controlling the masses, and the masses have no power to to adjust what's happening, but they have the power to complain about it at scale, but either you join it or you defeat it. And this is the hero's story. This is the David and Goliath story. And so we can begin to tell new tales of men, they can understand each other. And so rather than defeat each other, and so understanding because it takes the place of defeat, and as understanding takes the place of defeat you also I mean, you increase the resiliency of a society, because if we need to defeat each other, and we can't understand each other, then wars inevitable. But if we can understand each other, then we can reach compromise. And if we can reach compromise, then we can not destroy each other. Because we can, we can, we can handle the dissenting opinions much more gracefully, as we realize that we are we are the majority the under spoken the underdogs the the normal people, we are the majority and not the people with the extreme opinions. And then as we do that we can create platforms and and and media outlets that share these sentiments and to promote these sentiments as this is the shared understanding. This is the shared value. This is the common value. And then these people that express this cancel culture hatred are in the current era, expressing an opinion of we're sick of this shit. It's corrupt, and we want it to end. But they aren't intelligent enough and they don't have enough energy to to come up with solutions. They have they have. They have they have actions that will destroy the corruption. But we'll also bring down everything else with them. What we need to do is we need to be a little bit more surgical and we need to create solutions that read our common bodies of I mean, think about our body's infectious system. They read the body of disease, we need to read our populations of disease, but not in the Hitler way where we say Jews are disease. That's not That's ridiculous. But there's a reason that sentiment catches on is because that's a natural idea. So what we need to do is more accurately identify the disease and realize it's not one group of people, but it is corruption itself and that corruption itself. As young they put it this way that you know the route to good and evil the route between heaven unhealed divides each human heart. And that's true and we need to embrace that we all have evil in us and we all have good in us. But how do we get the the utmost good out? And how do we allow the good to flourish? And how do we allow people that express the good to to bond with each other and to create a resiliency in society. Um

so this is the way of anonymity is recording the screen will oughtred transcribes this and muting the audio of the video recording. And then just playing this, this is this is the, this the this is the anonymous way. This is the way

has the, as the Mandalorian puts it. So, I want to touch on disease for a second, it's natural because our bodies become disease and our bodies fight this off. So the body of society needs to fight the disease. The disease is not the financial banker, the disease is not the Jew, the disease is not the Christian The disease is not the black person, the disease is not the white person, the disease is not the Mexican person that disease is not the Japanese person, the disease is not the North Korean or the Chinese or the dictator. It is the idea that we can allow ourselves to be controlled without having an individual say that is the disease, the disease is the lack of sovereignty. So compare that to that we need to get deeper into the natural analogy and not just look at the surface level natural analogy and say, okay, disease equals group of people in our bodies eliminate the disease, our body, our bodies of society should eliminate the group of people that is the disease. That's what causes war. That's, that's, that's an ignorant idea, because it's not explored as deeply as it could be. So look at Okay, so there's a disease, what is the disease? Like in terms of biological terms? And then what are the the white blood cells? And what are the red blood cells and what relate these things back to nature, not just look at the surface level, eighth grade understanding of biology, that's my level of biology, look at the PhDs look at look at the people that really know what they're talking about, and bring them in and help them to create the analogy. In other words, we borrow from other fields, in order to advance other other fields, because underlying all of reality is the same base pattern. That's going back to music. That's how music can affect you the same way as drugs can affect you. And and that the atheistic experience is one where you deny, use, maybe you don't deny, but you say that the under the fact that I don't understand this does not mean there's something more to reality just means it hasn't been explained yet. But the underlying presumption is, everything can be explained. And that's just simply not possible. Dude. Scientifically speaking, it's not possible with our current science. It's taken us this long, in order to advance our canons origin story from where did we come from? And how did humans get here to what's controlling our brains? So perhaps the atheist doesn't ascribe to the notion that we're living in a simulation. But that said, certainly seems like a fairly likely scenario. The interesting part about the simulation hypothesis is that it moves the the first move not to where do we come from, but what controls us. So that's a very important inflection point in in storytelling. 200 years ago, this did not occur, God both created and controls. It's the freewill thought. And that wasn't the predominant thought it was the way that we come from thought that was the predominant in all of the world religions. But now the design guy cycles, the idea of the the, the control of the human mind, rather than the origin, not of the mind, but of the whole body of the human. The whole, the whole system, the whole, the whole shebang, where did it come from? And so, science never predicted this. Maybe it did with with science fiction. But it was never taken seriously. It was, there's no, there's no relation of what that means. And, and the flow of information as an analogy to the flow of electricity, or the flow of gravitons or however, however, these different fields work. There was nothing that said, okay, we don't know this. And here are the things that we're going to hear the things that we need science. Let's see I'm doing but I don't believe science tells us that things that we would need to know, in order to understand the things we don't know. So can science tell us the things it can't tell us the things that we don't know? It can't tell us how things should be. But can it tell us the things that we would need to know in order to know those unknowns? And I guess that's that's a scientific hypothesis. And if it's not, then what's okay? We know, there's unknowns, how do we get there. And those are three myths. And so myth is the bridge between science and religion. And the unknown, it's like this, it sits in the middle of those three things. And so this is getting a little ranty. But back to want to double double back on the infection, and say that the infection is not a group of people, it's not even an individual, it's not even a serial killer.

I would posit that there exists not a utopia, but a better place where these people are helped before they harm. Or at least we can decrease the rate of, of these kinds of problems. Same things exist for the evil, you know, the, the mafia bosses in the, in the and the terrorist leaders and things like that. One terrorist leader to its group of people is just the president to another to another group of people. So the way we see our, our chief, our military Chief, what does the President called the, like the commander of the armed forces or whatever. And if we were being bombed, if I saw my school blown up by by the Chinese, I would sure as fuck thing the Chinese are terrorists. And perhaps, perhaps, the Chinese is a bad example. But the Middle Eastern cultures, if they were, if I knew that they were flying unmanned aircraft, and blowing on my school, and they just killed my parents, and my brother, and I lost my leg, they would be the terrorists to me. But that's not to say get rid of our defenses, because I'm scared as fuck is the rest of the of the rest of the world. And without better, better, better power hierarchies in place, I'm terrified. It's, it's all on shaky ground, because it's just masculine, and it's unnatural. As soon as you merge the feminine with the masculine, and there's especially the respect for the feminine, over over the soul respect for the masculine, then you then you create a much more robust society in which people can live in peace. It's not it's not a it's not a utopia. But it is more robust and will promote more human thriving and more human sovereignty, more individual human sovereignty and may lead to a merging of capitalism and socialism and communism, because we have to realize that if we're really paying attention to all these ideas, they have brilliant parts of them. But But as men understanding these concepts, we say not not at every this is not the case for every man, but this is the case for the the masculine society is this will be the predominant it will be it will be the purrito distribution where we say, and the Pareto distribution evolves out of the the Well, shit, the printer distribution evolves naturally. at large as well. So that's a little worrisome. But the mother, the mother, like mother is a great distributor is one way to put it. So I don't know there's some kind of girdle Escher Bach, Ian thing, the strange loopy thing? Where Yes, the 90%, the 10% will create the 90%. The 10% will own the 90%. But it doesn't need to be exact exactly it is as it is now. I just can't think of what it what it may be. But the fair mother is an archetype that distributes equally and fairly. So perhaps the nine The 10% will possess the 90% but it will be in a more fair way. I don't know. Who knows. Okay, I'm going to send this to a few different people and see if anyone listens. Definitely Stephen, Matthew. The book of Matthew, the book of Stephen, a few others, but yeah. interesting thoughts here. Let me know what you think.