Should Ron here just so you know, we set you bar we'll send you a clip from our website but which mentions a lot of things that were mentioned regarding other kind of state parks. But there is a state statute that allows that a dark sky preserve to be designated and so that's another layer that we would have to go through because just because it gets designated by some other body, it would have to be you know, fall under the existing statute which are like wilderness State Park and some of the others are already covered under that. But the point that you get out here and I think Karis mentioned there's some compliant areas, but one of the issues is going to come as the lights on the bridge coming across that quite vibrant now would change. But I think getting to Michael's point, I think it has to be really thought through and vetted to make sure that everyone understands the impact, and then what it costs to diminish the lighting or that kind of stuff. So we're not I don't think we're in a position to react. I think conceptually, it's a cool idea. I mean, we've done this before, it's no question, but we just need to know all the different dynamics to it so that that we have the whole you know, plan that connects with a concept. So it's something that I think might take a couple of months to kind of get it organized and then come back and go through it. And so everybody understands what, what this might be. And the other thing of course, is that you know, people you know, will have to figure out if we, you know, pub higher engaged the public users to to Michael's point, you know, how do we get thoughts from the public on that? You know, so that's, that's another piece of the puzzle, but, but anyway, generally I think conceptually it's good, but like any concept, there's always work that has to be done and impacts and that kind of stuff. So and then we'll the statute isn't anything to be afraid of. It's just, we just want to make sure everybody understands what that's about to so anyhow.