I would say at least in terms of the three winners, the things that they really have in common are that they are very thoughtful and have just a depth of emotion and wisdom. And they also are books that very much show, rather than telling. You experience these books, you don't just read them. I will say also that I am kind of a historical fiction snob, the historical fiction that excites me is usually set before the 20th century. And not just in the Jewish publishing world, most of the books that seem to come out, that are being referred to as historical fiction in the last few years have been in the 20th century, even like up to the 80s. And it's like, oh, now the 80s or, you know, history and then that makes everyone feel old. So, I'm not sure exactly what's driving that. I think some of it is that there's something about more recent works that I guess people find more relatable. And also, I think performing the research and world building is much, much easier. Amazing as it is to read a book set in medieval somewhere, when the book is well researched, and well crafted, and you can really sink into the world and the details feel real. That's the most satisfying thing to me. But I also recognize that that can be very difficult for an author to pull off. And I think 20th century things, especially in living memory, or living memory of people that you know, it's easier to make it feel accurate and true. And I think that might be some of why these 20th century books are really dominating the historical fiction market these days.