I'll start with saying I'm glad that you to hear what you just said. I'm here to say that as a neighbor of purpose farm, I'm extremely disappointed with the lack and attention they've demonstrated in their capability and willingness to step up and comply with the standards that they're already supposed to be adhering to. in April. We had a few windy days as you can see from these photographs. Please keep in mind however, historically, March and April are the are the months in Colorado with the most wind. This wasn't an anomaly or something that should have been unexpected. We've seen zero dust mitigation from Purvis. at all so far this year. There has been obvious drainage issues that the builder assured the community that the town would not would not be an issue. While we did have a stench, a substantial amount of rain last week, I'd like to preemptively refute any argument the developer may attempt to bring to the table about this being an errant, uncommon or an unprecedent unprecedented amount of rainfall. May is in fact a month where we received the most precipitation in this area to closest cities, I can pull data from or level and really, they both show that may receive the most precipitation. In addition, while this event did fall into a top 10 event, it should not have been unforeseen to the extent that it was by this developer. There have been drainage issues in the past for houses in the estates that backup the purpose one of the main points brought up by the residents in this area was drainage. And the developer assured the residents in this council that there would be no drainage issues. It appears that the residents in the town were completely bamboozled on this by the developer. It's my understanding that the drain was covered and clogged by mud from improper improper drainage. And that caused flooding in several basements over in those houses. In a state drive was covered in mud after the storms that you can also see in the pictures. This neighborhood has been there for over 20 years. And the only place this amount of could have come from as the pervious development, we're not talking about a relatively small amount of mud from the rest of the streets around town that were caused by random washouts, which we all saw, the amount of mud on your state drive was substantially more than anywhere else. And the only place that could have come from was that development and the improper drainage. Much of what I'm going to bring up forward may be able to be unproven, just as I brought up in the notes I sent last week or last meeting about the developer losing their builder and being put on hold. I believe that mean, in that someone in that meeting said it was only scuttled that, that's fair enough, I can see that point. However, I like to counsel to apply some basic logic to these points here. More or less relying on the old adage of if it looks like a duck walks like a duck quacks like a duck, it is a duck. So again, it's my understanding the development was on hold. And from what I was told by an Excel infrastructure engineer is engineer as well as the common sense of observed observation from us. The zero work has been done since the weather was allowed, has allowed work to restart. We all know that time is money. And I think it's very logical to assume that if work could have been going on, it certainly would have. We further argue that work has been taken a step back as some of the sewer water pipes that were over there and on site had been removed. I would also like to preemptively addressing the arguments that the builder may bring up that the reason for any flooding was because the work was not yet complete. If you're a surgeon, you don't take a break in the middle of the surgery to go have a ham sandwich and come back and say, oops, the patient died. But it wasn't my fault. Because part of my part of the surgery wasn't done yet. You take precautions beforehand, you don't stop working or remove critical items from the from the operating table. Just as a surgeon, I feel like I understand that the developer may have come up against some issues. But sorry, just as a surgeon, you don't. If you're a developer, you take precautions and have adequate reserves in place you continue. I've only got about less than a minute left. Lastly to Richard to reiterate the comments I made in the last meeting by email, this developer has proven constantly to be a bad neighbor. I feel if they ran an apartment building they'd be considered a slumlord. Never taking any actions, any proactive actions, only doing the bare minimum and only when forced to do so. They've they've passed out they've have asked themselves their way through this entire process so far, when they were told to make all the lots of minimum square footage they didn't. When confronted, they said oh, that's an honest mistake, and we'll fix it. They obviously miscalculated on the drainage or either carelessly did did the work which caused the flooding. They clearly don't care about the dust they've because they've done nothing to mitigate it, as you can see from the pictures. Additionally, there are now weeds over a foot tall and remnants of weeds from last year over three feet tall. I'd like to see some accountability from this developer and I'd like to see counsel make sure all these eyes are addressed and fixed fully before proceeding with anything at all regarding this development. Any further delays that this might cause the developer, they have brought 100% upon themselves. Thanks for your time.