Yeah. I mean, I think that there's an interesting I think your analysis is pretty sound, although I think where I might disagree with you is that, if we're honest with ourselves, there's this chicken or egg problem where no token has any value until it does. That's just the way it is. And there's a set of utility that REGEN has, one of which is governance, another which is block space. Another, of which is its ability to be used in transactions between counterparties. So that's its current utility stack. So I wouldn't personally remove sort of like block space access or fees or those other things from the utility stack, simply because they're not being used. Because, if we're honest with ourselves, the governance is also not used that much. So that is what it is, right? So it's current utility is those things, there's a stack of current utility. I to me, it makes zero sense to take one or another out of that. Maybe it makes sense to note which of them is more used and which of them is less used, but it is all the utility now. I also think it is important to be honest that you know, although the plans for this are changing, like up until now, there wasn't a developer experience available once 047 goes through, which has been taking far too long, we will, you know, and and, Hey, Luke, good to see you. Once 047 goes through, there will be the possibility of developer experience. Of course, you know, I think again, is any, are any of those pieces of utility the most like of the essence of what the intention for REGEN is in the world? Now, I think that's a good question, because I think the intention for region in the world has been to link ecological value to economic value, right? And the early thesis was, you know, and remember, we launched, we started working on REGEN network, before cello existed, and before Ethereum was proof of stake, and before the modern world of sort of block space competition with massive treasuries existed, etc, etc. So, you know, we can reassess all of this, but that stack of utility assumed that we needed to have an open public ledger underneath the other layers of utility, which come later. So, so we can set that all aside, and we can say, what are the, what is the core utility that we need to be achieving at the application layer, at the ecological asset layer, at the at the interaction of exchange and value and and, and we need to understand that in some ways, we're talking about things that do exist. But as you noted, Max are currently not linked to REGEN token value directly. They're like, they're like, loosely or indirectly linked at the moment right, which isn't always good or bad, because lots of times token economics, you know, stocks, tokens, commodities are not always in a hard, deterministic linkage with value. Sometimes they're proxies for things. That is the way that the world works. So I'll just say I think we can I think we should be focusing on is, what is the direction that we need to be taking REGEN in order to more deeply link it to ecological value and to accelerate, sort of like total ecological value achieved. And it may or may not be some portion of that may be TVL, right? The total value that is locked on REGEN. I think one of our problems is we do have value locked on REGEN, probably, you know, but we don't have a dashboard about the value locked to the market cap ratio, or, like, the pipeline of ecological assets to the market cap. Those sort of just like logical linkages that help people think about things. I think that's in our drawing board around, it's been brought up. It's in the drawing board for a landing page around the token and some other things, but isn't yet done. So, you know, I think it's a very interesting prompt. And I think, I think we should be taking a hard look at to what degree do do we need to maintain our own ledger, and be spending lots of money to do that, versus focusing on the application logic and the value proposition in doing so on a different layer, one, what are the economics of that? What are the memetic and narrative outcomes of of that kind of shift? And that's been socialized here, I want to encourage that to continue to be thought through. And I want you know, you know, will zaal isn't here, the foundation, I think, is going to probably be skeptical of abandoning the ledger, at least completely. So I think if there's going to be that type of proposal brought to the community, just to understand that there's also probably something like a religious belief in the need for a sovereign layer one blockchain to have a actual regenerative accounting system, and that if you're going to be pitching something to people who have a nearly religious belief about something, it is useful to have economic realities, but you might need to package and have a discourse at a different level of sort of like philosophical, ethical, moral, reality and perception. So hopefully that's helpful to talk about. I see Giulio has got his hand up. I'm interested to hear what you've what's on your mind. Giulio,