Yeah, I'm totally with you there, Darrow those three things cannot be separated. And I think one of the struggles that we are going through in our society is something that's epistemological. You know, is there truly a standard? Is there? Is there absolute truth or not? And, you know, when you remove a cannon of something, well, how do you understand its opposite? Does that make sense? You know, if there was no true beauty or objective beauty, what is its opposite? Because the understanding of ugliness is that it negates what true beauty is what objective beauty is, there's no longer any agreement of what objective beauty is, or or not even any agreement. Let me rephrase that. If there's an assumption that it doesn't exist, well, what do you determine as ugliness, but at the same time, do what you're right and that there's something primordial within our souls that we kind of we understand, Umberto Eco wrote this in his book called on ugliness, he says, deepened down deep down inside, we do know, on a base level, what ugliness is things that don't promote human flourishing, but things that create further and further destruction, you know, on a broad level, but I think Romans chapter one, it's very revealing about understanding agonist verses 18 to 32, I believe. 32. Yeah. Yeah, the first verse where it says, from the wrath of God is revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men, who by their unrighteousness suppress the truth, how is truth, the understanding of truth, suppressed, morally, more immoral? It's, there's a this the sin part that Darrow brought up earlier, you know, it goes back to the sin nature, when you choose a morality, because it feels good. Well, you can suppress truth and understanding of truth and theological truth in that way. So you may choose ugliness. And then the rest of the passage goes on talking about how people have exchanged true beauty or ugliness exchanged the glory of God for idols, exchange, truth or lies. And it's part of the tragedy of fallen man. You know, that's a, a wrong definition of beauty, reinvents brokenness, because we can only choose what we deem to be a genuine beauty. So we're so people are in their fall, and it's because they're choosing sin that suppresses truth and now they're repeatedly choosing ugliness, and sacrifice and surrender. What true beauty is thinking the ugliness is what actually is the the alternative, you know, substitute for what we really need, but it's advice. I think Paul and Peter make this contrast as well to and identifying that ugliness is what corrupts, I use that word corrupt, you know, it goes back to the decaying, you know, the destructive part, you know, certain desires we have. So going back to the whites question, why do we want ugliness? Well, Ephesians 422, or 23 says that he calls it deceitful desires, Paul calls it deceitful desires that corrupt at the end, it's about truth, we're deceived, we're deceiving the wanting things, but things that actually corrupt, they don't actually build up it doesn't lead to flourishing, is not greater Cosmos within our selves, even more wholeness within ourselves is just greater destruction. But there's a payoff in there somewhere that feeds us in nature that tells you it's good. It's just deceitful desires. And then there's another verse, Let me I'll just do this one more out there. This is great. I think it's Philippians 113, I believe, where it says that God works in us to will and to work for his pleasure to will and to work to want and to produce his pleasure. Right if you can change a man's desire Wow, that is a powerful spiritual transformation to change what I'm what I find beautiful what I find attractive, you can change that and me, boy, you know, no longer is it just about me restraining from doing the things I know, intellectually, I shouldn't do. But now I have it in my heart to actually strike I for the godly things, because I'm infatuated, I'm enamored by those guys. It's beautiful to me. And I want that, you know, so God who works in this to will and to, to work for His good pleasure. Now that will have the work that desire and the effort now is aligned back to his delight, which is goes back to Genesis one because he says it is good, it is good. It is good, though people are told, literally means delightful or pleasing to God. There's a consistency in Scripture, that's so wonderful. You know, it's almost it's like a painting ever watch a painting, see a painter, or, more likely a TV show where you find like, that scene didn't fit, that character didn't fit, that line didn't fit. You know, that's the artistry in it. Right? When you have a master at work, everything fits all the strokes, the colors, that the comps they all fit. You know, there's that consistency in scripture where everything just fit so beautifully and wonderfully. You don't have a line in the poem that doesn't belong there. Everything just so wonderful.