That's such a lovely question. Maybe I'll just say something I've been thinking about more recently, which is, you know, a book that centers to female protagonists, both of whom, you know, at least for the majority of the their stories are around 12 years old. At some point, I realized, eventually that it was almost weird. Not to, they never encountered any threat of violence. There's never any, like, sense of danger or predation. And I feel like that's, that's, it's so standard, when we're looking at, you know, pre pubescent or adolescent girls, you know, like, a standard part of that story has to be how they're, they come into awareness of how dangerous it is to inhabit a female body, in our culture, you know, etc. And so at one point, I thought, you know, is this a problem? Am I is this avoidance? Am I, you know, am I being irresponsible to write these stories? And have both girls, you know, never come to any harm? Or am I being sentimental or, or, you know, sort of sanitizing? And then I realized, no, like, I, I'm not sure why I did it. It wasn't intentional. But I began to feel that there's something very powerful about having a book and which, you know, we're focused the entire time on these two girls kind of out in the world, encountering stuff where, where that kind of danger or threat of danger is just not a part of the narrative. And that it leaves both girls, I think, free to spend their energies engaged in, you know, much more interesting questions and adventures. So, yeah, that that was something that occurred to me only really after I finished writing.