Yep. And I know what this leads to what we were talking about earlier, about our difference in in what lanton are trying to bring to teaching and I other professors do, too, right. But what I was talking about with having great aspirations, you know, having a great open heart, but having that conflict with reality, right? And are you achieving your goals, if your counter to reality, right? The ACA does a lot of good stuff, but also to, you know, that, at best, it is aspirational, at worst, it's hypocritical, right? And I'll give you, I'll give you an example. Here's an example. A sustainability is a great goal. We make it a practice in our practice, right. But some of the new codes coming up some of the rules, some of the regulations about sustainability, and even affordable housing, are extremely counter to affordable housing. Right, by making everyone say, hey, we have this aspirational goal that we need houses with electric car plugins, in Denver, a lot of things have to be solar panels to pass codes, the insulation values are, are in 2021 are through the roof, literally, you know, like are 60 in the roof. I'm not arguing that that's bad for the building. I think that's good for the building, right. But you can't say that you can't have an onerous process. Same thing with the government, too. You can't design a building or neighborhood by committee. Have it be three years long process, and then complain that it's not affordable, you just can't, you just can't. I think there's ideas that a lot of people have that that we could aim for these different things. And maybe there is should be something as a top priority. And it can vary. It can vary. So for some housing, maybe the housing should be the top priority should be affordability, with the underlining of safety is key, right? We're not going to build anything that's going to do any any harm that way. We're not going to put asbestos in there. We're not going to make it structurally unsound all these sorts of things, right. But maybe that is a bigger issue. Right? And maybe other neighborhoods can focus on sustainability. Or maybe take these two up, maybe sustainability, you can still have that, but you can get it at its root. Right. And its root is power generation. Right? We should be advocating for clean power generation. And we can argue about nuclear power, and I would be happy to but the power density, and the storage capacity of the negative effects of of nuclear power are so much less impactful than coal, right? I'm still a wind is still awesome. Solar power is awesome, too. I know people have their issues with that as well. Just because of the minerals that go into it. Sure. But let's be honest, and net, let's not just put on a pretty face, right? And say I am for affordable housing, I am for sustainability. I am for all these other stuffs. So now anyone that looks at you says Oh, therefore what I'm for, but you're not, you're not, right. You're not for what I'm for. And just because I'm saying this doesn't mean that I'm against sustainability, right? Or against some of these other initiatives. It's just I am prioritizing and executing, because that is the way that the world actually works. Right and actually functions because the ramifications are huge. And here are the ramifications is that we've all seen like dystopian sci fi movies, right? Where things break down, and things break down, not because of our intelligence, you know, like me and you have skills, the people in government have skills. It's a bureaucratic nightmare. Yeah, that makes that grinds things to a halt. And all of a sudden, it's 20 years from now, me and you, and we all have kids and all that. And we say, hey, yeah, back in the day, I actually had a nice truck that I could drive around. And all this was great. And now it's in the future. And we don't have that, right. And we don't have food security, and we don't have all these other things. And I firmly believe it's because the bureaucratic system, always, for some reason, has to judge things by committee. And then committees become a bunch of priorities, and you can't meet all those priorities, you cannot meet all those priorities, because priorities means priorities, right? I priority, if you don't meet the lowest priority, that's fine. If you meet the higher ones, right? In business, if you're teaching business, you're not going to meet absolutely everything, you're going to strive for it. But there's priorities, and some is putting food on the table for your staff. And I think that's what we're exploring here today.