I don't know about misconceptions, but I know the big thing that I've been looking at lately is return to learn. It's kind of overlooked. Every state in the country now has concussion legislation that most of them only impact K through 12 because that's what the state really has control over. And the return to learn aspect is really overlooked. It's all about return to play. And we've done a really good job of educating athletes and coaches and parents about how if you're injured from a concussion, you're going to follow a six day return to play protocol where we progressively get you more and more active. But what isn't covered is the return to learn aspect is returning about students, they happen to also be athletes. And that return to learn is supposed to happen before they return to play. If you can't handle a full day of classes without symptoms, how are you going to get out there on the field and be able to perform? I think a misconception is that return to learn is taken for granted, and is not properly addressed at all levels. In my opinion. The study we did last year, looking at what was publicly available information on the internet, there was only about 60 to 70% of institutions had a return to learn policy, in addition to the return to play, so approximately 30% aren't addressing it, at least in policy. Now, the next step is to look at what is actually happening on the ground. And that's going to be a harder study to do to look at individual institutions. Are they addressing return to learn? As for legislation, I'm not sure that's the way to go. legislation is such a hard process to get through the literal act of Congress of speak. Whereas I think school districts should be more mindful of it to push it within their district more at the local level. I think states certainly can have a role in that. The State High School activity associations should definitely have a role in that of stressing return to learn before return to play.