Thank you. Council Member Santiago Ramiro, so my my concern with this, and it's not necessarily the rates, and I've had the opportunity to talk with someone in the police department about the process of actually notifying residents when the accident occurs, their option to go with a police toll authorized tower versus a third party. And so, from my understanding, there is a form that a resident can fill out, and that should be presented at the scene of an accident that says, Here is your option to go with a police authorized tour, and they have to sign and weigh, waive their rights, essentially, not to go with a police authorized tour or to go with a third party tour. Whether that is happening, is my concern that it may not be. And what happens is a third party tour comes to the scene before a police authorized tour does, and they're charging them 567, $100 more than what a police authorized Tor would charge. And in fact, not only are they paying more on site, they also are paying more in their car insurance, because the insurance company then has to take on that and they increase the cost. And so I reached out to DPD. They did inform me that recently, probably within the last six months, that a form now is presented at the site, and they have to sign it and waive their option to not go with the police authorized tour, but go with a third party tour. Now is that process being implemented? I have not received the assurance that I need. In fact, I'm looking at possibly trying to do an ordinance. There's no policy that's in place right now with DPD, there's more of an informal directive. And so I would like to see an ordinance in place that essentially states that if an accident occurs, or whenever you know, a police authorizer told company comes on the site that this form must be presented, that they have to sign and waive their rights. Because if not, what I'm hearing is happening is that third party tours are coming to these accident sites prior to DPD and are charging and towing these cars before the police authorized tours get there, and they're not even knowing they have an option to go with the rate that's, well, 345, $100 cheaper if They go through a police authorized toll service. So that's my concern. Is not necessarily the rates, per se, but how do we address that issue? Because residents are not even aware that they have an option to go with the police authorized rate at the 100 $200 rates that we're getting ready to approve, they're paying six, $700 to a third party, who, by the way, from my understanding, are finding out about these accidents somehow, and are going to the scene before the police, and they're making a whole living out of this, and who pays the resident in the towing fees, and they're ultimately paying in their car insurance. When we talk about the rate of car insurance, because the rate of your insurance increases because they're paying for these increased tow rates. So that is my concern, and I'm not trying to, you know, tie the two together, but ultimately, the resident is not even going to benefit from these fees if we don't address that issue. So I'm working with DPD. They did send me over a directive that was just revised that was sent out, but they did also agree that it could be looked into a little bit more whether or not this is being implemented. And then also, lastly, I would say that the third party companies, once they come on the scene, they should be providing some type of documentation that says, hey, you have a right to go with a police authorized score, and if you don't want to go with them here, you know waiving your fees there because they're beating the police to the scene, and they don't even know that they have this option. So that that's my position. Thank you,