alright. Fantastic. So, yeah, I don't want to go through too many slides, but just to give you sort of a little bit of a sense. So look, the first thing is the VIX was not designed for war reactions, for four for sort of being a war operator. But I think what what we were doing beforehand was actually quite useful because the idea was to have a sort of a research and a media publishing hub that would, you know, the overarching goal was sort of to increase the availability of reliable data. That turned out to be very useful because when the crisis hit, we had data about all of the different participants. We knew the market. The Media Development Foundation, for example, has a network of 100 over 100 sort of regional media and you know, the fix has been analyzing that data publishing about it. The other thing, which was quite important is that the organization has deep roots in Ukraine. So myself, I'm Polish, but my wife, my daughter, our Ukrainian, many of our team members, are either from Ukraine or still based in Ukraine. And so, you know, for us, it was personal. The second thing that I would really like to emphasize is that this was not a solo effort. It was actually the effort of there was the fix. There was the Media Development Foundation. Which is a Ukrainian NGO. There was our we Europe, which is a Brussels based media, NGO, and publisher, the cave independent health and genomics, which is a media consultancy, and what was really important here is that on the morning of the 24th when we all were woke up because there was a strong relationship between the different organizations, there wasn't really much of a sort of transaction cost to pull all of our resources and say like, there is, you know, there is one important mission for us now and that is to help Ukrainian media however, we can. The what we tried to do very quickly, which is kind of like what the, the fix has been designed to do is structure the problem. So immediately break it down into immediate needs, short term needs and mid to long term needs. And by immediate needs, we mean, you have two hours, right? Solve it. That's the sort of the tempo where we needed to react short term meant we have a couple of days to make a decision mid to long term. I mean, when the moment when we started to look three months ahead, that was as the long term plan. That was really a sort of a big sigh of relief, I think for that for the whole organization. This The other thing was to even try to break this down further. Because you want to worry about 24 people working on this, a couple of volunteers as well as people from all of the different organizations. And while you know, everyone sort of pays a lot of attention to the fundraising part and sort of raising the money that's sort of where you get the loud headlines. This was about, you know, 10% of our efforts. Most of it was going to the other workstreams and the way that we structured our work streams was you know, between donation of equipment. The micro grants, the transport and relocation, setting up alternative offices, a survival fund, and then this sort of sustainability support, which is infoPoint, which has come to fruition just now. One thing that was really important is the whole time whenever you structure something, it's not just about having a list of what needs to happen, but also having prioritization. Like if you need to drop everything, what is the one thing or the two things that you that you hang on to, you know, in the first kind of three days of the war when everyone was telling us you know, the Russians are going to take over cave in you know, in three days time in four days time. They're going to capture the whole country. You know, as as my my colleague, guy from from genomics said, Well, you know, okay, what can we do in those four days? Right? If we have four days, how do we make the most most of them? And so, initially, the two priorities for us were