Oh, how are you using it? Well, first of all, I have to say, in my master's program, back in the, you know, 1900s i i was not trained in the use of AI, and I would hazard to guess that most faculty are not trained in any use of AI, right? Same, yeah, and yet, we're sending these clinicians out into the world where agencies are using it, and then practices are using it, but we don't have trained them because we weren't trained ourselves. So that is one hurdle in our work. Because if anything is going to be slow to adopt something, it's going to be education, particularly higher education, bunch of PhDs with opinions, and it's hard for us to move. We can't even, you know, edit a mission statement without 50 people weighing in with this. There are tremendous opportunities. And I honestly think, and I if someone listening has something that I don't know, please share. I say this every time I do a podcast or an interview or I'm doing a presentation to my knowledge, the PA u e clinic was the first university training clinic to use AI as a supported supervision tool while training our students how to use AI as an injunctive co therapist model. I think there's others doing it now, but no one was doing this in 2020, when we launched so with our students, they had the opportunity to work with clients in a telehealth setting. We taught them all the things that I think faculty are teaching now, like how to conduct a zoom setting therapy session rather like how to set up your background and your lighting and your audio, what to do if tech fails, how to know where your client is physically located. Those are things we do train on with the AI that we were using. We were actually scribing the session, so it was being recorded in a transcript, but it did not automatically go away at the end of the session, we held on to it for six months because it's students, and the AI gave us metrics about the session so it's able to analyze the transcript and say, you know, here are your keywords. That's pretty basic content analysis stuff. Let's just do all the keyword search then looking at the keywords and the phrasing, here's some themes that seem to come up for this client. There were a number of mentions of relationships, this number about Father, this number about Mother, this number about boyfriend, then anxiety. Here's how many times the client said stress or fear or other words associated quickly, the clinician or the supervisor could eyeball these metrics and have a sense of what happened in the session. Then a platform could also tell the supervisor where the clinician used certain interventions where they did some value, affirmation, rapport, building, agenda, setting, a CBT intervention, and I could go forward then as a supervisor in the video to that point. So I don't know about you, but when you have a lot of supervises, and they see a lot of clients. I don't watch 60 minute sessions in totality. So this gives me, as a supervisor, the opportunity to see some of the big things that are happening and check that with what the video is actually showing, or the audio or the transcript, to make sure that that's accurate. Is that really what's happening here? Was this really risk? Was this really an intervention? All of that, when we can use that to make our university level supervision more targeted, our students then learn how to make their clinical work more targeted, you know, where am I doing? Well, what could I improve upon? Is is visible, not just in a videotape?