He talks about his nuclear weapons, right? Clearly. But if you get into the cyber element, what if today he had a very destructive attack, not just in Ukraine, but in a NATO country? What is the proportionate response? Does that trigger Article 5? It raises all sorts of issues that we, to this day, are still ill prepared for. And so I guess, to your - - this long winded answer -- but that's why this last piece, which we still haven't finished yet -- it's kind of exciting, we did the other stuff -- but this is really the last piece of the puzzle that we're trying to put together as it impacts international norms and standards. Private sector cannot hack back, that's illegal, although I talked to a lot of companies that would love to do that. That is a role -- we don't want to Wild West, everybody's shooting their guns off, so we need rules of the road, but we need to know what is a proportionate response back. Once you do the attribution, and you know where it's coming from, then I would say we've crossed -- had too many red lines, the ransomware attack on colonial, you know, and then we put some red lines up, and they get crossed again. It's just like the father of five, if you don't have consequences of bad behavior, guess what? Bad behavior continues, it's a very simple concept. We don't have that. And they hit with impunity. Russia, China, Iran, North Korea, and I would argue that our response to this day has not been adequate, and the consequences have not had certainty to stop the bad behavior. So, therefore, the bad behavior continues, and that's precisely, Andrew, where we find ourselves today.