There's, there's just so much incredibly interesting things. So I would recommend and then I'll be a little bit more specific about what might have been happening with this woman. The Pure Land teachings have probably given me the most on this because they they talk about this with real kind of clarity and rigor, all the different bandwidths, the frequencies of existence in the samsaric domain, really super interesting to explore and then I know people really gifted meditators who claim and I trust them, that they can actually like the psychic, they can explore these dimensions and they see them all in this kind of ultimately democratic way. We just for all kinds of egoic and someone who breadstick reasons tend to think oh, this is just, it's just it's like this is the only realm it's this kind of Galileo or Copernican, you know, it's like spiritual Copernican view that this is the only way right everything is, is self centric. Everything is is Earth centric and all that. absolutely, positively not. So the puroland teachings have a tremendous amount to say here, all these different dimensions, both samsaric and transept Zark that are just as real and in many cases more real than this. So for sure, 100% Guaranteed. Now in terms of what she experienced, I can't say with tremendous conviction and authority that I have to ask her a ton of questions. But here's the thing about psychics. Psychic is just a label that we appended people that are really just open. These are people where their boundaries have softened very often women, not always but they're just more porous. They're more permeable, they're more aware and awake of these, the interplay between all these multiverses and so psychics are just basically people who are more open and as you become really, really open, that's what the Buddha is the ultimate opened one. Then then these these these universes become completely available to you and throughout the literature. You meet all these accounts of masters you could say the ultimate psychics who certainly teach and when they teach, they see it's not just amongst them annoncer there, they see the bodhisattvas there they see all the I mean, literally as I'm seeing you, they're able because they're so open, they see all these different dimensions. And so I love this magical in the best sense of that word, not the pejorative sense, display of reality that we are, the world is really as you know, not made of matters made a hard mind, spirit, whatever you want to call it in the display of that heart, mind, spirit, all its iterations is infinite. And so we can tune in all the stuff totally. So whether she's doing it authentically, or whether it's a projection of her own thing I can't say but that's the other thing that definitely can happen. So here's the kind of the so called shadow side of this for sure. You can also then have projections of this where it's not this ontological thing. It's purely epistemological. In other words, it's your projection. That's a little bit harder to tease out. And usually when I get engaged in these types of conversations on a public forum, it's not the venue to do that right? To really talk somebody through and just say, hey, let's be super clear here. What are you seeing what are you feeling? And then I will say, and I don't do it in a public setting, if this was my experience, because who am I to say, this is what's happening? I can't do that. But I would simply say based on what you're saying, if this was my experience, this is what I think is happening. So I'll pause for a second to see if some of those noodles are sticking on the wall for you. But that's what comes to mind. I mean, I love this stuff, because it just shatters conventional ways of looking at things and and parenthetically, again, from a more scholarly academic point of view. This three part series is massive contribution irreducible. Mind, beyond physicalism and consciousness on bound. You'll be reading these for five years, massive contributions from the academic scientific community, about decimating this materialistic world and opening up to the magic of a, you know, idealistic world in terms of philosophical term, you know, and then reading the stuff. Reincarnation studies for cognitive studies, telepathic studies, clairaudience, clairvoyance, all the stuff that is categorically dismissed by the scientist. And I think it's largely done that for psychological reasons, actually for fear, you read this stuff and it will blow your mind open in a really great way. So I'll pause for a second to see if that helpful, but that's what comes to mind.