it's always a hard choice. We and for me, it has been a hard choice. Because I've seen a false narrative come about and I know that if I start commenting on it, first of all, it will give it prominence more people will pay attention. And there's a lot of people especially in Target, in non free societies, to whom it is difficult to accept that the government's are evil. It's just not a natural thing to accept. So the moment I expose it to both sides of the story to them there, many of them will be more likely to bind to the official narrative which is the misinformation there. So that's one reason to avoid it. But it's always difficult. It's tempting to address it head on and to say, Come on, this is obviously fake. And this is where it's leading you. The other problem is what we discussed a bit earlier. You may know what's going to happen. And you may prefer you may in certain conditions prefer to let it happen. Because if you publish the information beforehand, it will. It will teach them it will train them and again, this is not what journalists should do. But But when there is a a war at stake, it's so difficult to be only a journalist and sometimes you again, as I said, you decide where your boundaries are and then you act accordingly. But I don't have the answer to you. For me, it's everyday it's a question do I do this or do I do that and and and I've made wrong choices? I'll give you an example. I mean, i i There was a lot of intelligence information last week that there were, there was a column of there were three columns of tanks approaching the key of capital cube, and that in total, there were more than 400 times. And this was valid information. We we saw objectively, that the tanks were there. And everybody in Kiev, the government was freaking out. The tanks are coming. They're coming. They're coming. Please tell the world they're coming. And I was wondering whether it's the right thing to say or to to post it or not. And I did tweet, I said there's Intel evidence that techs are coming and the tanks stopped so they didn't arrive. And it kind of provided a an attack angle to people to discredit the information saying, Well, you see, the things didn't show up there. In the same way that a lot of people are saying the times were wrong did when they said the word was out on the 16. So it's a choice. It's a risky choice, and I don't have the answer.