Yeah, I think New York Times had a, you know, survey, where they had an analysis so like, you know, Colgate was actually really bad. You know, they're, they're, let's call them like, you know, somewhat obscure rich kids schools, Hamilton, Colgate Colorado College, no offense to my friend who might be listening who went to Colorado College. But you know, they're these, they're these private school, they’re great schools, but they don't have the names of Harvard or Yale. But basically, you know, that's where like, lower upper class, upper upper middle class kids, people go send their kids to have fun for four years, you know, major in business or whatever, before taking over this car dealership, or something. And so then you have Harvard, I have to say, I've written about this multiple times on my blog, maybe I'll post a link to it. You know, we've talked a lot about Harvard, because that's the case. And Harvard is important because Harvard is where the American elite, especially the liberal, and the Democratic Party elite, the McKinsey elite, Goldman Sachs elite, you guys know what I'm talking about, is formed, right? These are the people that will write for the New York Review books in the New Yorker. It's important, you can go to University of Michigan, get a degree in engineering and have a really great life, as, you know, Senior Manager eventually at Ford or wherever, but you're not going to be shaping the public discourse. Like if you want to shape the public discourse, if you want to be a leader, you'd go to Harvard, right? If you want to be the head of the NIH, maybe go to MIT. But I just want to be clear for non Americans what the stakes here are, and why people care. And I also want to be clear, let's just make it explicit, and transparent. What Harvard is about, it's not about academics, it's not about merit. The people who go to Harvard are all smart, they used to have really high test scores, maybe in the future, they won't, because we won't know. But the point is, yes, they are all scholarly, but they're not selected from the top scholars of the country, there is a minority of them that are selected, because like Jared Kushner, their parent is really rich, it's a very small minority. But everybody knows who these people are. And if you ever talked to people that went to Harvard, you know, exactly. Like what category they're in, because they do not sound like they should have gone to Harvard, you know, let's just be honest about that. Like, they're just dumb compared to the other Harvard students. Okay, so we got that category, we have a lot of legacies that are coming in through athletics, they tend to be white, they play lacrosse, or, you know, they do some swimming or whatever. Okay, so like, there are those people, then you have the Asians, and you know, the other minorities, they tend to have less legacy, although, you know, as the generations go on, they'll have more of that. So, you know, you have this hybrid student body, and what they're trying to do is they're trying to create the power elite, and that power elite will eventually give them money. And we'll give them prestige. And we'll give them power. And so they're not just trying to educate students, for the world, they're trying to maintain their institutional power in this country. So if Harvard is 40%, Asian, that is a problem. Because you know, government in the United States is democratic. And people do tend to vote for the people of their own ethnic, you know, background, that's just a fact. It is very unlikely the 40% of the people in the House of Representatives will be Asian anytime soon. So that's just going to be a problem in terms of their racial demographics. And I'm just, you know, Harvard says they're about, you know, like, I saw, like, Drew, is it Gilpin? Was that the former president's name before the, or the current one of Harvard? So what she said like 10 years ago, something like Harvard's about inclusion, this is just a flat out lie. Harvard is about exclusion. Like literally, okay? In the literal, like, if an alien came down, they'd be like, Wait, does that mean the opposite of what I think it means? So it's a flat out lie. Well, why did she get to live because like, you know, she's, you know, President of Harvard, she gets to lie. So they lie to your face. And they tell you a certain thing. And you're just supposed to, like smile and bear it because, you know, most powerful people, they went to Harvard, you know, you know, editor Atlantic went to Harvard, you know, New York Times, publisher went to Harvard, so they're not going to call the president of Harvard out. But that's a lie. It's not about inclusion, it's about exclusion. It's about creating power. It's about maintaining the power and maintaining and perpetuating that power. And it's about also like keeping the endowment large. And so if you see some internal statistics, not that, like people have told me these sorts of things, but maybe they have, that there are different patterns of different ethnic groups of who gives money back to Harvard, and these elite universities. So this is, like some of what cannot be spoken of like, let's just be entirely honest. You know, yeah, they do kind of care about diversity. But I mean, what they really care about is maintaining their status in American society. And if you make it based on say, a standardized test, they have no control. They want to keep control. Right. And so that's the fundamental problem that I think is facing them right now. They have everything under control. I mean, I know what type of like, you know, mathematical models they're using in terms of like tuning the parameters. I mean, it's like with modern computers is trivial. You can ethnically balance so easily. And like figure out like, what bundle of characteristics and stuff like that. And I know that some of these universities use like, you know, interviews and all this other stuff, but, and they must have like a certain quota for the super rich that like, you know, the dad will fund a building or something like that. So I mean, I think like that's that's not true, right? Apologize to the listeners and the viewers, but I did wait for a while before I went off. Sorry. Some of them complain if when I express my views too much, but I waited for a while. Okay, so you're doing your dissertation on affirmative action? We've been talking for a while, I think the listeners and viewers know what is going to happen. And they know the historical context. What are you going to be doing? You know, in policy, if affirmative action is officially a thing of the past, officially.