So the video is his kind of he's not a historian. I think that's important to kind of just to note, but he's, you know, an incredibly successful investor who is always interested in the kind of macro events of cultures and organizations. And, you know, his kind of line of inquiry was, was was isn't it has always been understanding the economy and the growth and boom of organizations and the growth of booms of various economies, and, you know, the more data and information that he can understand about that gives him more insight to become a successful investor. And this line of inquiry led him to start to study, you know, 500, of civilizations, great empires, and to kind of look at, or what's the lifecycle of an empire? And what are the things that are causing them to collapse? Or to decline? Why did they decline? What are the some of the warning signals, and to start to try and look at the US particularly, and the kind of the West in general, but the US is the preeminent power in the West, for sure. And it has been the kind of economic mind on the planet for, for the best part of the last 4050 years or so, or certainly from the kind of the Second World War onwards. And obviously, his in his interest was, was kind of trying to foresee what was going to happen economically, for his own personal protection and for the protection of his, of his clients and his organization. And so, he was a he pulled out three main empires to kind of draw a comparison to. And, you know, he does make a kind of argument in a book, he's written on this that accompanies the video. But he, you know, there's other empires that he did that he didn't look at in great detail, but he kind of had an overview of about 500. But he focuses on in on the Dutch, the British and the American empire, and starts to, like, you've just outlined, they're looking at, well, what are the sorts of catalysts of decline? Certainly, because that's what we're interested in. And, and he's trying to look at, well, what were the what were the indicators in decline the British Empire, and, you know, the Second World War was one and political tensions were another what were the declines or the things that happened with the, with the Dutch, with the Dutch empire, so that we can see these kind of start to extrapolate some of these patterns, so that we can locate ourselves now, in, you know, whereas the US if we make a prediction, you know, is it in decline doesn't feel like it's doesn't feel like it's on the right on the rise feels like there's a lot of tensions, we've just come out of a pandemic, there's lots of global worrying, we've got this other superpower, China, that seems to be basically just being a complete monster, all over the world in terms of production, output, intellect, you know, it's a real powerhouse, I say, monster, in a kind of, you know, in a positive sense that it's, it's, you know, it's the center of innovation right now. And it's kind of, it's very competitive with the with, with the US. So this becomes very interesting. And he makes the kind of assertion that the US is, is showing signs of decline. And that this has an impact on near the kind of things that we're experiencing now, some of the signs of decline, that implies typically have always gone through, like we said, the tensions, internal tensions, so we're living in a society right now, where you're, we're kind of being forced to take a side on something. And there seems to be this kind of inflated sense of polarity, which, again, we've spoken about this in the past, were kind of cynical of the polarity, actually. And there is a kind of fabrication around it. But social media certainly has accelerated this and compounded it. And it becomes, you know, it's just creating tribalism. And when there's that kind of tribalism, that's happening, you've got internal conflicts, and it becomes more difficult for an empire or for an institution to make effective decision making. We see it in the US with the Democrats and Republicans, either party is more happy to just stop the other party from succeeding. Irrespective of if the decision is good for the US or not. It becomes much and so that's that's massively, massively ineffective. And he starts to make the make the point that when these empires start to grow, and get this kind of get massive like this and become bureaucratic, that their ability to be innovative declines. People at the top are fighting for to keep the status quo, wealth inequality starts to increase. So you've got the the haves and the have nots, and the difference between them starts to accelerate that causes and that fuels more and more tensions. And at some point, there's some kind of often that what happens is some kind of reset. Amiens, you might think, at the French Revolution is a good example of, of that, or, or what happened in communist Russia, with the, with the, with with Lenin and, and, and things of that nature. So what's the impact this is it's all very interesting to kind of consider this and to start looking at a kind of an economy and a society or an empire that we're part of, and we've taken for granted, I think, in many ways, and we've taken for granted stability, and, and growth. And, you know, we've, we've always expected things to go to just keep on getting better and better and better. But now we're faced with some very real questions of like, okay, well, what's actually what's, what's the future? And more relevant to our conversation? Well, what's the future for what does this mean for architecture? And is the architecture the architecture industry is is part of the larger economy of the of the US and the West. And we're starting to see quite, you know, this old model of running a practice, which is becoming increasingly ineffective to operate. Certainly, as this kind of world economy, world economy is beginning to shift and to change.