for just saying that the steering committee should only publish material that it believes has either been approved, approved by the membership through a vote, or is in line with what the current membership or what steering believes is in line with What the membership is currently like. Okay with basically, Don thoughts, because my my concern is that outside of like me, Riley, Adrian, like Paolo, no one's really had a chance to think about this, and like no one's really brought it up as a concern, and it seems I don't even appropriate it's the right word, but it's like, how things get up when, like, you just spring this as a concern to like, all their new members, Chris, I like, don't know what's going on even Yeah, and they're like, can you come up with a process on the spot? And like, they don't really know the day to day workings of how the org works. Or, like, yeah, like, they don't know how it works, and then so they don't have, like, a reasonable idea of, like, how they would like to intervene and, like, have a solution. And so I feel like it would just up, because we'd come up, like, we'd come out with some process that, like, makes no sense unless, like, we're again, just being dickish, like, at the general meeting. And like, let me tell you how it is that steering, like, as steering. And like, if we're going to do that anyways, let's just put forward a very status quo proposal and put it up to, like, an up and vote, up and down vote. And then just say, if you do have a problem, there's a thread, work on it, talk to other members if you're concerned. And then once there's, like, more of a consensus that this needs to come forward and there is a problem with how we're doing it, like, then we can address it once members actually have experience enough to come up with a solution, like an educated solution, basically, okay, not thoughts, sorry,