Let me - Yeah, I mean, that was great Max. Let me um, let me set the... let me summarize and set the stage a little bit for the listener. So a lot of listeners are going to be American. They obviously know where the Philippines are. They probably know Filipinos personally. One thing that I think surprises A lot of us Americans, though is there is no real ethnic group, I guess maybe that's Filipino. There's a lot of different ethnic groups in the Philippines from the different islands from Luzon to the north. So you're talking about the Cordillerians they are in the northern interior. And then there's obviously Mindanao where there is the Moro Muslim minority. It was a lot of political things. But then there's there's other islands like Palawan, or where there's a variety of islands where people are from these different islands. When I you know, lived in California, you know, people will say, yeah, I'm from the Philippines, and my family's from this island. So there's a lot of distinctiveness in these localities that I think a lot of us forget. And also the Philippines... I think one way, a stylized fact, that maybe you know outsiders. I mean, I'm thinking particularly Americans Westerners can think of is, you know, when when the Spaniards arrived on Manila Bay, in, you know, in the 16th century, the Philippines was already on the edge of the Austronesian Malayan world. There were already Muslims in Luzon. And there were already sanskritized, sanskritic loanwords in the various languages of the Philippines. So it's part of this whole maritime Southeast Asian landscape united by austronesian languages. And obviously, the Philippines took a different cultural trajectory. It is a predominantly Roman Catholic country, because of centuries of Spanish colonialism. You know, if we had an alternative history, the Spaniards never arrived, I think the Philippines would probably... the same thing thathappened to the Philippines that happened to Malaysia and Aceh at first and then later to Java, and eventually was happening to the... Austronesian speaking Chams in Southeast Asia in Cambodia, I think they probably would have become part of Islamic maritime Southeast Asia. But obviously, that didn't happen. And so we think of the Philippines is very distinct, and it is religiously, but I think the broader cultural matrix is this Austronesian maritime Southeast Asian, you know, world. Now, your paper complicates a simple narrative of southward expansion on the order of 2500 years ago, triggered by rice, you're introducing all sorts of other possibilities because of these diversions that you're talking about. I want to, I want to repeat, this will be in the show notes for the listener, but I think I want to just repeat like these populations you're talking about. So we have one clade of, say, northeast, northeast Asians. And you start out in your graph on the left with the Cordillerans, who are this northern Filipino group in Luzon. And then next to them. In the clade, do you have Amis who are Taiwanese indigenous populations, you say separated on the order of 8000 years ago. And then next to them, you have the Dai, which are a South Chinese group in the highlands of southern China, then, of course, the Han of northern China. This looks like the separations on the order of 10,000 years ago, there are some lateral gene flows for various other groups. Further out, you have the various Austronesian groups. And then finally, the northern East Asian groups and indigenous Americans. So, you know, that I think that fits our intuition. So you are saying here, if I get you correctly, in this paper, that the expansion of populations that are more similar to North East Asians, like, you know, kind of like lineages descended from maybe what we would say, listeners on this podcast will know, the sample from Tianyuan 40,000 years ago, right? This happened , considerably before the spread of agriculture into Southeast Asia. So are you asserting here that perhaps the interaction between the indigenous - you know - I don't want to say Australo-Melanesian, although that's the term I think Bellwood uses, but basically the -you know- the earlier populations that are ancestral to Negritos and what we think of as the rice farmers actually predates the rice farmers being rice farmers like is that the implication here that the Austroasiatic people were pushing into Southeast Asia before they were agriculturalists.