I mean, I jumped on here when, when Scott was talking about, you know, taking the risks and trying the new thing. And it's such a great energy to bring to our nonprofits, right to just have that energy, that enthusiasm, where is our where our hearts leading up, and there's that big question of, where's the funding going to come from? Right as we as we try and test new things. And really, I love the work of Rob Reich and others who've been talking about, you know, philanthropy as society's risk capital. And really that's what philanthropy was designed to be, the opportunity for us to take risks, to try new things, understanding that systemic problems won't be solved right away, right there's not just like one winning solution right away that's going to solve these big, complex problems that we face. So I love the idea of taking more risks. And I think, like you're saying, you know, we need philanthropy to step up to the plate and give us the opportunity, you need to take more risks. And, you know, building relationships anywhere takes time. It takes trust. You know, it takes patience. And we're building relationships with each other as nonprofits, but also with our funding partners. And you know, for some reason, I think progressive philanthropy in particular has just not come along the way that, if you want to split this ideologically conservative philanthropy has really figured this out. You know, we don't have to guess about how philanthropy should change, because we you can look at a model on conservative philanthropy and really see how well they do. They're very smart about the way they've been funding for decades, right? They're funding in 20-30 year increments. It's general operating support, right? They're acting quickly. They're not micromanaging their grantees. They're really giving people the chance to just figure things out, and that's because they trust their partners. And for those of us who are trying to solve systemic problems, we know money needs to flow to people who are closest to the issues. Why we're closest to the solutions. We know we have to fund people with direct lived experience. Why? We know what we need to solve our problems, right, solve the issues facing our communities. And yet money doesn't flow. So for us, we really looked at the process flow of how money is moving here in the U.S., and one of the biggest bottlenecks, when you analyze a process flow for how many moves, you can get stuck right away. And you you know, for me, I got stuck right away in the application process. It takes, you know, 20 hours to apply for a grant that I'm going to get 30% of the time. Never mind, right? I don't have the relationship with the funder. I don't even know how to get my application into our funders hands.