As we did have some rules of the use for agreement to ensure that there was respectfulness and so forth. And again, it was such a pleasant experience. And when So, as I was driving in that morning, one of the things that kind of came to mind for me was it catchphrase, to kind of help bring order to the room if needed, but then also to show that in order to see a future, you sometimes have to go back to where you started. Started personally, as well as an organization. So the catchphrase was back to basics. And I hear that you've been using that phrase. So for those of you who were there, first, can you raise your hand so we can see who all participated in the exercise. And so when I say back to back to, and we use that throughout the session to just kind of reground us and focus. So I realized that we we, I only have two, very short minutes to go through this entire presentation. So what I'll choose to do is just give a brief overview of each of our activities, and some of the observations that resulted from those activities. And then I'll proceed with going into the recommendations and the timeline. And that's okay. And then I believe that there will be a question and answer or discussion session. And then if I need to go back and provide some clarification, I will do at that time. That's okay. Perfect. Next slide. All right, that first activity was more just to get the ball rolling, and just to see where there were some commonalities and differences amongst the group. So we divided our room into two parts. We asked a series of questions that had two responses. And at that time, we read the question the responses. And for those members who are participating, we asked them to pick aside which response resonated most with them. And your package, you will see there's, there's three, we did a series of eight questions. But these were the three that kind of really broad, broad, that really resonated with a pad. So we asked some question, my neighborhood needs more resources, or my neighborhood needs more representation. Our neighborhoods are more alike than different, or our neighborhoods are more different than alike. I'm a member of AIPAC to be a change maker, I'm a member of a had to be a to be my community's voice. And so that exercise, as I mentioned, showed where, you know, in real time, how the members were alive and different in their selection of the responses that most resonated with them, I thought that was a pretty good exercise to get things going. And to this show that wow, it may seem as though you have a lot of differences, you really do have a lot of commonalities. The second exercise was called for the people where we use this as an opportunity to come outside of yourself as a patent member, and take the plate and instead be the voice of the community in which you represent. So we, we facilitated a series of questions. And at that we asked you to answer as if you were a community representative, or community member, but not an AIPAC member. And so, I'm sorry, let's keep going. We also have activity two. Yes, that's the slide. Thank you. The question is where who is Atlanta? What do the people have in common? And what what do they need from us? Meaning a path. You can see the responses. And so what I found very interesting is that there were some people who took the position of, you know, a resident who's, you know, a legacy resident, a senior and the community son took the perspective, you know, a younger generation to others took positions of activists that are in the community that are not affiliated with In the MPP system or the board, and then these were the outcomes, I think what really resonated to also is what do they need from us as a path number, communication, education and information, inclusion advice, actions that result in feedback group, understanding and empathy, a unified voice willingness to have hard, controversial conversations on the behalf of the community. These were things that came specifically from the members that participated. This is not the consultants summary, these are your words of what you believe that US citizens that you represent you want from you as an APEC member. And then to wrap up that for the people activity, we listed all of the things that are highlighted in your mission, that AIPAC are supposed to provide some advice on Environmental Quality parks and open space land use zoning and transportation, we asked you, you know, has, in the last year, went to these areas as a path most impactful. And as you can see, at the bottom, most felt that he had not that impactful in these areas. So that begs the question to us as a team is, so what is a patch? Whoa. You know, are, what job are you doing? What outcomes do you have, and that inspired conversations that led to us our third activity. But just in summary, some of the key takeaways for that activity is that it matches diverse and multi generational, a path should keep its mission first. And you know, also that all interviews aren't represented a path for some reason. And people may not know what the outcomes of a PAP are, because there is no clearly defined feedback loop. And then finally, a bad test really hasn't in the last 12 months hasn't made a lot of progress. And again, these were opinions of those who participated that day. So activity three, was focusing on purpose. So we took some of the information from the previous two activities, to help be the purpose, discussion, activity threes observations, just because we are running short of time was that APAC really needs to work on his communication, and improving its relationships with the city and the various city departments. You struggle with time management, and having a focus. There's a lot of disruptions that challenge your success as an organization. There was a thought roll it came up that APAC needs a designated planner, we walked into the into the strategy session, we will loose with assumption that he is your planner. But it was articulated a couple of times that probably need someone more to provide more of administrative support for the organization. And then the last observation was personal agendas, that a lot of the work that is done by AIPAC, when successful are not coming from the community through the MPU system, but coming from individual board members, personal agendas.