Yeah, and full disclosure, we are an investor in Repurpose. So we've worked very closely with them on that PFAS issue. But just for the sake of your article, so you know upfront, Safer Made has invested in Repurpose, partially because we worked with Lauren McPhee, the CEO over the last few years, to address just this. Part of the reason why I've seen what does and doesn't work, and what the limitations are and are not, is because of our relationship with them; and they aren't the only ones by any means. It's also a tricky area because molded fiber is a particular subset of fiber. Your paper products are different and don't have to have PFAS, although paper cups usually have plastic liners, or those like craft pulp-looking boxes sold, rather than; are molded. Those are all basically laminants as well. So paper processing, there's a couple of technologies and ways to avoid PFAS. You have multiple options with various end-of-life kind of performance. In molded fiber, you have fewer options, and that's where some of the challenges come. So I always try to make a distinction between things that start out; it really comes down to manufacturing; so things that started out as flat sheets. Which cups start out as flat sheet; and so do those kind of fold into go boxes. Those have different economics and there's different constraints on how they can be made to perform. But they have more PFAS-free options, not all of which are compostable because a lot of them rely on polymer films. Then in molded fiber, you have some general ways, and this is also true for paper; you can use more heat and pressure. Basically, if you want to make something more water-resistant and more oil-resistant, the less porosity you have, so the fewer pores you have so liquid or oil could get in, the better off you are. Basically, it gives you a better starting point, and that takes changing your manufacturing, takes changing some other things. So that's one piece of the puzzle. And then the other piece of the puzzle is what PFAS did which is that they would put it into the wet pulp. And so if it goes into the wet pulp, it's very inexpensive to add from a manufacturing standpoint, and it gets all over the fibers. But there aren't a lot of wet pulp additives. There are now some from a variety of chemical suppliers that you can add. You don't get the performance of PFAS, so the performance is not quite as good, especially when it comes to oil. But you can get a decent; there's some additives that now exist, and that wasn't the case of few years ago. A few years ago, there was really nothing to add there. And the other thing you can do that most people have tried to avoid, but I've seen out there, is you can also take a molded fiber product; you can basically make your mold or your cup or your plate, and then afterwards spray a coating onto it. And there are a number of different spray coatings, and some of those have been around for even a little bit longer that do give you pretty decent performance. But it's hard to do when, say, deeper [drawables?]. It's also hard to give you encoding and it adds a significant expense to the manufacturing process. This has always been an issue; of chemistry that performs well enough at a cost point; it's not that the chemistry is expensive; but at the main manufacturing costpoint to still make sense.