I'll go to our key takeaways. This is on the sheet. The first is that if you look at disproportionality analysis, it shows that across the board, there are very, very few and very, very small disparities within the DHS office. You And there are certainly some disproportionality he's meeting those inputs that I just showed you. There are a lot more Hispanic and black defendants being brought to us with cases getting there's a wide variety of societal factors that can play into that. But once they come to our office, those disparities are very, very low. The second takeaway there, though, is, there are some, and so now we're starting to look at what some of those are trying to figure out what actions we can take to mitigate those in the office. That first one there, which is the second bullet point is about deferral race, again, that deferred judgment means we're giving someone someone's pleading guilty up front, they're doing something usually like probation, probably for a short period of time, 612 months, they're doing some things like community service, drug and alcohol treatment, maybe domestic violence treatment, if they complete that successfully, that case is getting dismissed. Programs like our diversion and deferral programs, we see as big potential to be equity drivers within our office, because they are giving folks these huge opportunities. And that goes back to my discussion about the benefits, please, to get these cases dismissal, and to learn something to try to mitigate whatever behavior brought them into the criminal justice system, and to come out a better person who is not going to reoffend and therefore should be able to go on with their lives without the burdens of convictions, incarceration, and other things that the criminal justice system can bring. So getting that deferral rate, in better balance is important, again, that that discrepancy was small, but two and a half or 3%. So it's not, it's not a huge problem, but it means we'd like it to be even smaller, that's our goal is to reduce as much as possible. So that's one of the things we're beginning to look at that third bullet point there is dismissal rate. And it shows there is a different dismissal rate between White Black and Hispanic defendants, that one's a little bit trickier to say what we want that to look like. And the reason is because of that disproportionate number of cases being brought to us. So for instance, if four or five times the amount of black defendants are brought to us, well, not filing more of those cases or dismissing more of those cases isn't necessarily a bad thing. In fact, it might be doing a service in the name of equity, if we are dismissing more of those cases. So that's a very tricky metric, higher lower is not necessarily bad, we need to be looking at the whole picture, which is why this is a 40 page report. And then finally, I'll go to some of our actionability steps. The first one is is training at our office. And so we want to make sure that everyone in their office from victim advocates to Deputy Bas, to our investigators to our staff, understand, understand bias, understand these disproportionality that we're talking about right now understand our role in the system. And we've done that Mary's going to talk a little bit more when she talks about our office here in a second, when some of those trainings look like not, but we did a couple of different trainings last year that were all staff, all attorneys. And those are very valuable to sort of foster these discussions and make sure that some of these issues were on the forefront of our radars as we went about our work. The second actionability step there is is again, what I talked about that deferral program. So we're trying to expand our use of deferred judgments. We're trying to provide more training and what those are what people should be looking for. One thing that is being discussed that the community currently is is how we use criminal histories. And whether that is a driver of inequity in today's offices, because if someone for instance, in a district, maybe that was not as forward thinking as we are in Larimer County, if black defendants or Hispanic defendants were receiving more convictions, for instance, in and I'm not trying to pick on them, but Arapaho, and then they come up here and we say, well, we're not going to offer them the opportunity of diversion for the first sentence because look, they have a criminal history. Well, that criminal history may have already been driven by inequities elsewhere. And so we're looking at ways to sort of eliminate some of those factors