about the workforce, the labor issue, and our offices has experienced it, probably every one of you have seen it as well, but it's it's real, and that's the core of the reason that the program shut down. And I wasn't looking for a promise from you. I was saying is there a chance How can we do a lot of potential promise resurrecting and so I appreciate it? No, I I appreciate that. And it's like, I really hope that before I retired, that it's up and running again and it's, you know, bringing in people and helping them yeah, good questions. Let's do counselor Parkinson counselor minutes. I'm sure chief Krantz knows what I'm going to talk about right now. But you know, one of the things that that you you sort of addressed this at the beginning, but I wanted to come back to it. One of the other reasons why we wanted to talk today was about the fact that there are those in the community that think that either the City Council is is or the city is telling telling you not to enforce laws or not to arrest someone that may be living on our streets, or or basically not doing not allowed to do anything. And I was hoping you could can again, talk about you know, your process when when something like this happens and also if the campaign code has impacted how you do that work, when anyway. Yeah, I mean, I think we all get that question. I know you all get it I get it. In my emails frequently. Our officers get it. And our enforcement authority comes from Oregon Revised Statutes from what we enforce as well as federal code at times, city ordinance rules that that's the piece you have a part in creating a city ordinance. But once those ordinances are made, those are our authority to enforce. We're also obligated to ensure that people's constitutional rights are protected. So and then we we go about our enforcement by also looking at those changes in law. Just because it's written in the RS doesn't mean it's actually something we can enforce. Sometimes there's case precedent case, case decisions, appellate court decisions that affect how we do those enforcement actions or if we can take enforcement action on a law that may be written in the books. Frequently, I think what we see is and I don't want to with all due respect, city council doesn't have authority to tell us how to enforce the law. So I think that's that's really the biggest issue is there is no there's no direct connection between city council policy to how police officers enforce the law that are that are really written the books and that are our job to go out in force. Where some of that confusion comes in is our community, sometimes when they call the police have a certain expectation around what they think should solve the problem for them. And we respond, we observe what's happening, whether it be a crime or maybe not a crime, and our solution because we're limited by again, rules, laws, rights, court decisions, level of violation: we're limited by that of what types of actions we can take to solve a problem. And something like I said before, sometimes our problem solving is education, leniency compassionate response around learning what people's issues and concerns and problems are, and then having some different solution, but what we see is our approach to solving those sometimes is doesn't meet the expectations of the community. Because frequently people just want to see whatever problem they called for go away, and that's not always the case. So then that's when we get that frustration and of the police officer didn't do anything right and their hands are tied or city council or somebody's telling them not to do anything. I got it. I get it to me too, is you're telling your officers not to take action. It's just not accurate. It's just that we take the action based on what we have authority to do and what we think will solve the problem at the time. And it doesn't always need to commute expectations. Thank you. That's okay. Could I Yes, Councillor Campbell? Thank you. Thank you again for being here. It's nice to meet you in person. I so I just have to admit, I did not understand about measure 101 I absolutely understood that those previously illegal drugs were being decriminalized for possession. But the part I didn't understand was that using those drugs in public is has also been decriminalized. I know you can't comment on any kind of, you know, proposed ballot measure or anything. But, you know, do you think is a way to make that change? And leave without interfering with that goal of measure 101 to decriminalize just possession in someone's home for example.