you explain what I a I'm sorry. To interrupt International Association of Chiefs of Police. Thank you Major City Chiefs from around the country meet and to discuss best practices. I participated in that and we've been looking to move towards the release of a a model that would show officer involved shootings and critical uses of force not just officer involved shootings, but also officer involved shootings. We looked at a model in LA. We liked that model. It provided as much information that you could at the time, certainly you made it very clear in that in this particular model, that because of the nature of these cases, that some of the information is subject to change. So what we want to do and what you've noticed we do and critical incidents and Officer particularly officer involved shootings is we rush to put information out we do. We put information out we go right to the scene. We talk right to the community about these incidents. I don't see a lot of agencies doing that Detroit does it. We go out we're standing there. It's important. I can put out a statement now we're standing there at the scene. We're telling the community this is what happened. We put it on our social media, this is what happened and we we then say and we always said as boilerplate language. This is preliminary information subject to change. And most times it does. We get the we download all our video assets, not just body camera, but video assets in and around the community that are germane. To the investigation. We talked to witnesses and sometimes things change if there's a charging decision against the officer, or I make a disciplinary decision, and I can and I have the authority to do that. And sometimes I do that and it's not always tie bar to whether or not the officer has been engaged in an unnecessarily an excessive use of force or an improper use of force, but there's a procedure evaluation that I look at. Okay, so there have been cases where the officer made the appropriate decision to administer feta force Absolutely. And the answer is and one case in particular, that has come up, the officer was used the appropriate level of force with the threat that he or she was met with. The problem is all of the facts and circumstances that led to us being in that circumstance in the first place. That's where the violation occurred. And that's when I submitted to this board, a suspension without pay. That was candidly refused, based on the inconsistency of the chief. So you've got the chief now who is trying to hold an officer accountable and the board saying, at least not publicly, that this is improper, but then of course publicly. We speak to this lack of transparency, and these issues involving releasing information. So as a result, I've repeatedly asked his honorable board to follow the law department's legal opinion, mandating that the board act according to the city of Detroit charter article seven, specifically chapter eight, by citing the relevant portion of the Charter, which you may be seeking the information under some of the information that's been asked for we know has been talked about at nauseam that one instance incident in particular, officers information was compromised. Put on someone's social media platform. And this had to do with the officer. Again, an alleged inconsistency of two documents where one document internally did not speak of specifics as to why this particular officer was being suspended which is by design because that first document is an internal document that goes to payroll goes throughout the department to make a payment decision for the officer and the status, whether he would be he or she would be suspended with or without pay. If with pay before this board could act, then they would be in an administrative capacity without pay it would be with benefits. And then the board gives them more granular detailed information, which again changes from the initial incident with as to why I want to suspend without pay. The two documents were posted side by side on social media as evidence to my inconsistency. Now what I find ironic is I offered both documents. So if I signed it authored both documents, one would imagine I would pick up on the fact that there's a bit of difference in the two documents. So again, I offered to this board that that was by design because one is internal, and one is for this board and subject to all the rules of FOIA and other things such as that. So that is where I'm at. I continue to want to work professionally with this board. Now this is not about scorn or ridicule. I took an oath of office, and I am very committed to doing my job in the face of danger, scorn and ridicule is actually part of the officer's code of conduct. But what I am looking for is this board to to continue to engage in a professional oversight of this, this police department as I intend to do, and that we not go back to a very dark time in the city's history where council members were fighting amongst each other. And certainly that is something that I will not participate in. I enjoy having a measured approach in a professional attitude. And I think it really does a dis to the community. It does a disservice to this police department when you're looking at a major city reporting numbers such as this. You've got officers working very hard. Lastly, I will say this. There are two cases that continually come up to him and we want to solve them. We really do. We're working very hard. Get the best homicide group in the country that are working day in and day out to close these cases. But I spoke to this board earlier in this presentation and told you that we have 227 homicides, we got a 52% closure rate. So that tells us about 112 have closed maybe 111. And we've got another 100 Plus families that we have to deal with. We're going to put the same energy and effort in the other 111 as we have in the ones that are not going to treat any two cases any different than any others. And I don't have any information I can provide any different than I have and when I have more information on those two cases that come up, I will be prepared to present them as I have in the past, but that will not be today.