yeah, so Hiram, just let you know what I normally do in that particular case. Sometimes I have conversation with myself, notes to self, so I'll turn on an otter and start talking about just exactly what you said, and then I'll I know I got to tell it. I have to offer context domain expertise, is what it's called. So sometimes I'll flip through my books or look through my obsidian, and I'll see references, and I'll mention those things, and then I'll stop my conversation to myself, and I'll let it make summaries. And then sometimes the summaries that come back are exactly where in my rat's nest of notes that the operational document is, and that helps me out. So it gives me clarity of thinking. I get my best clarity walking or parking the car and talking to myself next to a lake, watching ducks, whatever works, notes to self. You've been around long enough to know that sometimes hidden deeply in your cognitive declining state is the answer. And so if you're where is that file or what should I be thinking about? And then bang, sometimes talking to yourself, in my case, talking to an AI that then shows me words I said, and I can take that transcript or the summary, pop it into my obsidian, and I use a service called Smart connections. It's semantic, so it looks for semantic links to things that I think that I should know, and I may be off by a few words, by exactly the reference. But there's a semantic register tells you point five like 50% chance it's this. Point nine, it's definitely that. Point two may be related extraneously, but perhaps worth looking at. And the top semantic links are what I tap into and say, oh, there it is. So now that's rewarded me for having a process. The process is pretty simple. So I started with like thought text files using a service called ask Sam. I moved into to ask Sam. From ask Sam into Evernote. Move from Evernote to one note. Move from one note to notion. Moved from and now use notion and obsidian together, and it's really clever. So a man that I met in Brussels and a woman I met in Eindhoven and I are now using their main line and into my obsidian. My obsidian is on this phone. It's on my laptop. So I'm working a book called authentic storytelling in the era of AI with fontis, which is connected to, you know, you and Antwerp. And it's dramatic. What I mean, while this call is going on is getting obsidian notes from Bridget in, in stuff. And I'm thinking, right? So, like my thoughts go to one direction, her thoughts connect sometimes, sometimes they don't. And what's up to us to parse it, to kind of say, what can what's common here? So we do sometimes sketches. And you know, she was upset with a sketch that I did. She said, I don't understand that pie chart. Why did you do that? And it's in a polite way, very direct, Dutch way. I said, oh, sorry, you know, so I, you know? I Where's my pie chart? Can't find I do this pie chart, you know? And so there it is. And she says, the AI is too big. Storytelling should be bigger. I said, I know this is the first cut. And I said, Here's how, here's what I'm missing. I'm missing a slice called empathy. I'm missing a slice called ethics. And I place this, and your notes aren't in place yet for them. And AI rendered this, and Tara that she thought it's just I sketched it, but I see now it's politely telling her, I know you have stuff about empathy, ethics and storyboarding that are meant to be in the notes. They're not in the notes, so the pie chart is skewed. Now, too much AI, and she'll fix that, and that'll be good. But now that's interesting, because an AI could have generated that. I did it because I didn't want the AI blame. She would source the AI as she would see me blaming her for not putting stuff in her stuff's there, but it's the annotations are incorrect, structures incorrect, and she'll fix that. But that's really clever, and this has all happened over a space of, like, two coffee chats where I said, look, let's let's share notes directly. Cut the email string down to nothing. Only deal with me on signal, deal with the rest of stuff. Just put hashtag ask Bernie, or hashtag action Bernie, that has to get done. And like, I just look at my hashtags and respond to the stuff and the text and her coffee break, she looks at it and it's really clever. Now, that's a practical workflow for someone that's designing a joint research project. And if we do something with your guys there at Antwerp, I'd say, look, let's establish the community, the collaborations protocol, what? What is it? Because I can give you 25 years of stuff in a lot of different topics, a lot of it's rats and it's too much stuff. So let's focus it. Start with a structure, and that becomes a submission document, the outline of it, I populate it, and now you have too much stuff in a good way. Could write a book first before you write the research proposal, but it's so comfortable you actually have the goal post at the end in sight. Just got to refine your move on the pitch, but how to get there. And it's so beautiful, because the beauty is in the instructional designer. You can put on that, because I have some really good instructional designers, and they can make it pretty, and then they give that over to you, and that becomes your design language for your virtual reality thing, or your Augment, your AR layers, it's just lovely, you know. So anyway, that's where I am on this all. Start to answer your question. Talk to yourself, you know, try to remember the key terms you use, and if they aren't in your notes, fix your notes, take your you know,