Yeah, absolutely. Absolutely. So, you know, there was maybe six months of really trying to figure out what's going to be that initial use case for designers. And it started out being a questionnaire that you would send to a client. And they'd answer questions about what they like what they don't like, and then AI would generate these ideas. Turns out, that wasn't the best approach allowed, designers want that initial control, or working with their clients. And it's been really interesting kind of having our, our own ideas about how AI might be affected, how AI might improve the process for designers, and then actually getting that in front of practicing architects and getting their feedback. So one thing that we did was actually looked, we looked at history to kind of understand what what might be happening here. And one thing that came up was at the advent of the photograph, there was some initial backlash with designers and photography. It's really interesting, because at the time, you know, let's think back to the etchings of beautiful architecture, right? The person doing that sketch or that etching, now they had freedom to add better landscape, right or to add people into the view that really added to it and you know, the classic birds, right? As soon as you do Fatah geography, what you're getting is a realistic representation. And what if a photographer comes around and takes a picture of that building before the landscape is built in. So, you know, going back, this was like maybe 100 years that there was a pause to incorporate photographs into the process of architecture. So overlapping that with what we're dealing today is this idea of these AI models. And one thing that we're curious about, and working towards is this idea that the same way today, companies have photographs that represent their work that they then show to clients, that then helps them get more work, which the photograph also makes up their own style, right. So this is what we're striving towards, for the Pinterest board. We think this might also be what happens with these own AI models that have been trained to understand the style of a firm. So what that looks like is, internally, these models are being used by the design team. And after 612 months, what's happening is each designer saying I like this image for this project, and you're getting all this data that can then be used to retrain that model. And over time, you actually get a pretty good representation of what that firm describes as good design. Because the ambiguity here is, the way you describe classical architecture is different than the way I describe classical architecture. And the truth is, the way it is described is with an image or with a sketch or with an idea. So what Corbeau is providing is a platform for firms to start training their own AI model. And that's something that's super effective internally. So of course, partaking the visualization process with renderings and ideation. But over time, we see that there's probably going to be an interaction of different stakeholders with that firms model. And, you know, think back to the 1960s, and photographs of works of architecture, were only shown to the client, when you went in the front, and they would flip through the book with you, right, you know, this is our best work. And there's still some of this, you know, projects being under NDA, or not every project is shown on the website through through photographs, but often it is your best work and you are promoting it. So we think right now, there's going to be some hesitation with models being used externally that represent the firm. But over time, that's going to go down, and the comfort level of letting others interact with your own artificial designer, your own core, boo, let's call it Yeah, is going to allow the architects client to partake in that design process and have a more delightful experience. It's going to allow, you know, in RFPs, there's not going to see