absolutely. Yeah. No. Thanks. Thanks, Steve, so the Yeah. So basically, the, you know, all of the state broadband offices have, you know, done their sub grantee allocation processes and had a number had provisional awardees. So part, part of the requirement of the restructuring Policy Act is that states, you know, open that again forbidding for new categories of of players. And so this is, you know, specifically, you know, technologies that were excluded, other than fiber, to to a large extent, that were excluded or, or at least minimized in the earlier rounds. So, so, and within Arizona, they just opened the window for that. And I think it runs for what, two to three weeks or so. It is very quick. And typically, in most states, people who pre registered Ford originally remain registered. And can, you know, update the update, update their filing, or keep it similar, and then new new entrant, new parties can participate as well. Yeah, yeah, and then the other thing that's this happened is there's been a flurry of interesting letters. I'd put it that way, on sort of policy notice topics. So Wispa, the wireless ISP Association, sent a letter to the NTIA talking about several states had had indicated that they wanted to have a testing requirement for wireless ISPs, and so they were sort of pushing back against that. And they also indicated a few things that where they wanted the NTIA to provide clarification. And actually the NTIA did. So that was, that's actually a really helpful letter to read and has some interesting detail. There was also a letter from a group of senators to the Commerce Department and from the NTCA that kind of largely represents fiber interests to the NTIA. And there was also an interview with Gary Bolton and the FDA and FCC commissioner Gomez, who basically made some arguments about how the ground is still tilted towards fiber. So those were good discussions, and then very late breaking news, just this morning, like an hour and a half ago, Gary Bolton sent a letter to all of the membership of fiber broadband Association. And you'll probably see reporting on this today, because it's, it's pretty interesting, but there's been a lot of analysts, you know, going through the, you know, the one big, one big, beautiful Bill Act, which just, just passed. And, you know, we when we see it reported in the news, we see a lot of stuff on, on Medicaid, and a lot of stuff on, you know, just all sorts of provisions one, but one of the things that is important in terms of the dollar figures is actually some of the tax provisions for corporations that are particularly beneficial to capital intensive industries, and fiber is one of them. And so, so, so basically, you know, there's been a bunch of analysts, and then he sent a letter to the membership. And so basically, the the view is that this is going to very substantially benefit the. Cash flow of a lot of fiber operators. So you've got companies that were struggling and, you know, some negative people sort of having problems recently. So so that'll that'll reverse that. So in an environment where the fiber industry has taken a lot of hits, it's a really interesting and, you know, perspective, so, so What? What? So there are a couple things in the policy notice that are, are particularly consequential. And I wanted to step through a few of these, and mainly focusing on a few things on the unlicensed side that people may or may not know. So in Appendix A, you know, it lays out a set of requirements for unlicensed fixed wireless providers, and it talks about managing interference and planning capacity and managing the impact of weather, among other things. So, so I wanted to unpack a few things that I think are interesting most of us, when we think about a a wireless ISP, this is sort of what we picture. It's a a point to multi point antenna on a tower or a building pointing to a home. And this is sort of what it looks like, and they provide internet service. What's interesting is, there's a whole nother category of of wireless broadband providers that are not as obvious. And here are three different products. The one on the left is from AT and T the one in the middle is from T Mobile. The one on the right is from Verizon. And basically what they do is they use the cellular network. So something that's been, you know, built decades ago to provide fixed services, and so they file with the FCC, not only as mobile providers, but also as fixed providers. And those of you who watched the Super Bowl or watched it in 2022 or 2023 or 2024 would have seen the the T Mobile super, Super Bowl commercials, and you can see in the background, there's this little box. And basically they're trying to compete with cable, you know? And so the argument is, forget about all the complexity of installation and drilling holes. You know, just walk into the store, get this box, plug it in, and you're up and going. And these tend to be services that sort of underperform, say cable or and certainly under perform fiber and are often not qualifying broadband because of the performance thresholds. Although sometimes they're they're very good as well. It depends, but, but they they're offered at a lower price point. So it's an interesting sort of piece in the market. And this is, this is a slide that may be overwhelming, but actually it's a very simple message that basically, if you look at the filing of these firms as mobile operators, you get sort of this colored Gestalt, sort of picture here of lots of dust particles, and basically each of the bright spots is where a sell side is located. And what I've done in this image is I've juxtaposed on top of the mobile, you know, filing, sort of the fixed filing, which is the olive colored, larger hexagons. And you'll see that what these companies do, and this is all T Mobile data, but if you look at AT and T or Verizon, it's pretty much the same. And if you change geographies, it's also pretty much the same, but basically what they do is they offer the fixed service in in areas where they've got really high quality and 5g coverage, and they don't offer it elsewhere, but, but this is a huge and growing segment within within the industry, and you'll see when, when you look at the, you know, the quarterly reports of of, you know, the large mobile providers, you'll see them talk about this as well. So this is a picture of something the FCC issued, and is one of the few snapshots that we have into broadband adoption, okay, as opposed to coverage. Most of what the you know, the FCC is broadband Site Reports is, you know, who covers each geography, but this, these are numbers that represent the number of people that have taken out their wallet and bought a particular service. And so we've got all the traditional, all all the traditional fixed broadband providers here you've got mobile providers where, you know, pretty much every man, woman and child has a smartphone, and you've got hot spots and other stuff. You also have fixed wireless broken out into two segments, and, you know, and basically they're labeled here as live. Licensed and unlicensed. But if you dig into the data, you know The first group is is overwhelmingly, probably 90% you know, cellular providers who are providing service using the architecture I just described. And then the unlicensed are pretty much all traditional wisps. And there are some traditional wisps that have have used license. But what's interesting here, in the license component, this has grown by its quadrupled in size over a two year period. So very, very consequential growth. And again, you'll see this reported by CEOs of mobile providers as well. It's something that they're they're interested in. So, so having understood that, if we step back and say, what are the strengths and weaknesses and pros and cons of different