Make sure you speak up a little louder. This is an issue which is burdened Detroiters for years. There's no question and over assessment issue occurred. The last 10 years we've taken steps to ensure to assure Detroit that the assessment was correct. But understand that there's still a lot of suspicion, what happened happened, there's no way to pretend it didn't happen. And the conversations over the last six years have really rather locked people up understandably. For most of us, our homes, the biggest asset we will ever own. And any any thought that government is doing something to take it away from us should raise concerns. We just concluded this the March board review. They say the tray has a two month window to appeal property values. That would have been the time to bring any suggestion of massive over assessments when we still have control of the assessment role to make changes. I find it curious that this was brought up the day after the Board of Review closed. Quite simply, if it we were in session through through Saturday, if someone had proof if they had facts, that there was an over assessment on the on a massive scale occurring the city, we had jurisdiction of the assessment role for two months, we could have made those changes. The fact is they brought 566 parcels to the assessment to the marsh border review. In a city of 400,000 parcels 214,000 houses, they brought 566 properties to the March board review. That's the fact the other fat is if there is evidence of systematic over assessments in this city, there is a forum to discuss it and to challenge it and to have it corrected. And with all due respect to this honorable body. This isn't it. The state tax commission has complete and total jurisdiction over assessing matters in this state. Anyone who has evidence, evidence that Michigan law is being broken, is obligated to take that evidence to the Michigan State Tax Commission so they can correct it. Madam President wouldn't work once the board review closed our ability to make changes on a massive scale closed, we simply don't no longer have the ability to change the assessment role in that matter. We will take any concerns of the traders about how properties are valued to heart. We'll look at everything I've told council that we will look at every part parcel any, any property that people have questions about, if we need to reallocate our staff to start looking at low value neighborhoods, and let me be clear, we'll look at low value neighborhoods. So that's how the state requires us to value property. I can't go house by house and say this one's under 34,000. So let's look at and go the neighborhoods angle that low value neighborhoods and we can direct staff to look at the conditions to those neighborhoods and make the appropriate changes between 2004 and that I guarantee this counsel that we will do. We hear what people are saying our ears aren't closed where most of the stuff If in our office, listen to where Detroiters we understand what people are saying, We understand the pain that the over assessments in the past have caused. We're not sitting there stop on our foot saying it's not happening. We're not going to do anything about it. I do not believe and I know, let me rephrase that. I know, there's no systemic problem in the assessor's office of office with how we value properties. And I am prepared to do what's necessary to assure Detroit in this honorable body of that we will direct our resources toward those Lauren values. We will conduct we will conduct your own sales analysis, we will review the conditions of those neighborhoods, and where appropriate and necessary, we'll make the changes. We're also moving forward with our own sales analysis through their national association of assessing officers. I apologize to this body, it should have been done by now. I apologize directly to you, Madam President, because I promised you it would have been done by now. Circumstances, most of it mine and prevent that contract from going forward for procurement. But it's not because we're trying to hide something. The reality is this is a complicated map. This is a big city 400,000 parcels, our staff reviewed over 65,000 transfers last year to determine assessments in this city 65,000. That would be the third largest city in the state of Michigan. It's not a simple process. And both sides want to make sure that they developed a contract that covered all of the all of the contingencies that did everything that the city required, and actually adhere to ICAO standards. In addition to conforming to Michigan law, that contract will move forward, that sales analysis will be done, the results will be released to everyone. If they find errors in our processes, they will be corrected. If they find systemic errors, and will report to the state tax commission. We will do everything we can to ensure that people can have confidence and have reason to have confidence in the season assessment roll everything we can do within the law. I cannot take a sales analysis that the author has said doesn't conform the Michigan law, that the author I'm not saying this, the author of their sales analysis said it doesn't conform to Michigan law. I can't take that and do anything with it. By his own words, it was a global look at opyt nationwide bias and assessments. That's a worthy goal, we should be looking at bias and assessments. But by its definition, it's not a review of assessment practices in the city of Detroit. I cannot take that sales, study and justify any anything. It doesn't conform to Michigan law. That's the