That's a big question. I'd say the starting point has to be that the dream that we had 20 years ago or 30 years ago has actually come true in some ways the Internet has become the central medium, the essential communication medium of our time. And how do we make sure we're building our technology and our communications as a tool for human progress, right? How do we engage in this international conversation between the closed societies of the world and open societies world? How do we make sure we're building technologies of freedom and not technologies of control, and building our federal apparatus to take on those big questions as part of what we need to do to adjust to recognize, these are issues that now affect people in their everyday lives? I think we need more cross cutting structures that can think in a deeper way about the implications of the technology that we're building. And that can move more quickly to think about how we put the guardrails in place that will make allow us to innovate, but safely. How we think about the long game of implications, right? Like I think back 20, or 30 years ago, you know, we made some really good choices, I think about how we thought about the tech, the development of the Internet, including like embracing innovation, embracing free expression, giving people strong encryption tools to protect their privacy, those were real choices we made. At the same time, there were things we missed. And I think we didn't see, we didn't imagine we would find ourselves 20 years later without a privacy law. I don't think we saw what was going to happen with misinformation disinformation in the world? And how do we develop the capacity within government to think deeply about where technology is going, and also about the economic implications? Like, I look at artificial intelligence, think about job dislocations think about how that's going to affect a lot of our economic structures. So we need those deeper capacities that cut across, you could have a lot of debates about which where it should be built. We're trying to build a center of excellence at NTIA to think about these things. But I think I think back to my first job, my first policy job in Washington was at the Office of Technology Assessment, which doesn't exist anymore. But was this beautiful organization that brought together experts in technology and policy to think deeply about the implications of the choices we had about technology? We need more structures like that. And we need more people who can come into government who have this crossover, understand technology and public policy. You heard it already multiple times today. And we need more spectrum engineers, we need more data scientists, we're getting really good at service delivery, we still need that dual competency, that crossover of people who can speak technology and understand it and also understand public policy. And those people can come from lots of different walks of life, you people are those people. And so I just say we need your help. We need more people like all of you, and we need your engagement on all these big issues. And that's the biggest thing I think we need to do and federal government get more of that capacity.