Well, I'm happy to address that question. As a university professor and a scientist. I would say science is completely agnostic to your race, gender, religion, or any combination thereof. Other fields not necessarily so if I were a teacher, or a grade school teacher or a police officer, perhaps, you know, politician, then it might be useful to have people who are different races and genders and religions and all that sort of thing. Because the human experience is different, but science is not human experience. And if that's what we're discussing, especially in STEM and then MIT, that's one of the points. It might be different if you look at literature, because literature is more human enterprise, but I would say science doesn't require or doesn't care what you are. Having said that, what you've talked about how you choose to implement it, which is that the average man might not think about the period. And the average white person might not recognize that we brown people don't show up well on cameras, but for what it's worth, it's not because of programming. It's because of the detector. We're at MIT. So I'm talking about detectors for a bit is the detector