okay, and maybe if I do say five, five minutes of just machine gun and then, and then we can. You can pull back and digest it. So basically, I was going to try to step through just the a little bit about the the organization, you know, what was released in the organization, some of the highlights by section. And then after that, I have some broad sort of integration questions which we could either get to or not, but they're, you know, they're sort of conceptually, put those towards, towards the end, when we, you know, after we've had other discussion. So, so basically, you can tell a lot just from the, you know, the pagination here, basically the the, what's called the NTIA bead restructuring policy notice, which came out last Friday, has a press release, and then a fact sheet, and then, you know, this document is about 23 pages long, and the, you know, the background and purpose is Just very short. There's several pages on elimination of regulation, regulatory barriers, or that's the way it's called, and they're each treating a specific policy and clawing it back. To some extent, a large portion of the document is related to technology, technologies, technology neutrality, some, some sort of presents a conceptual piece and and other sections talk about the implications for broadband offices and so, so we can kind of step through that, that a little bit. So these are the, these are the things that are are regulatory requirements that are changed. And I won't go through them in a lot of detail, but they basically take each area where I think the the new administration is looking back at, you know, the the original NOFO and saying, you know this, you know, expressing the belief that this overstepped regulations or should be clawed back in some fashion. So in each of these areas, you see that happening. And just as an example, in, you know, for instance, with the middle class affordability plan, which is part of the NOFO that's gone things like the low cost service option, you know, is, you know, they, they, they're asking entity to be, to be kind of less specific in terms of pricing and and, for instance, the eligibility is, is shrunken from one that was tied to the affordable connectivity plan to one that's tied to lifeline, which is a has A smaller eligibility window. So these, so I won't go into a lot of detail because but, but we could come back to these, if desired. One of the very interesting pieces is those of you who were intimately familiar with the original NOFO probably remember the concept of a priority broadband project, which in that context, was defined as fiber. So it was 100% fiber. And so every state broadband office, you know, sort of went by and large, went through a process of doing, kind of a fiber bidding cycle, and then things that fell out, you know, subsequent, you know, cycles as part of the broadband the sub grantee selection process. So here they are redefining it. And there's this statement says nothing about fiber. It has the download speed, upload speed, latency, and then it has some text, which is, is potentially consequential, talking about it, can easily scale speeds over time to meet the evolve, evolving connectivity needs of households, households and businesses and again, you know, a household may be fine with 100 down. If you're a hospital with, you know, doing MRIs every day. You know, not, not you know. And then and support the development of 5g so, so, so the idea that the investment now supports other infrastructures, and we'll come, come back to this in a moment there. And then I'm sort of going largely serially through this. And again, it's 23 pages. So just grabbing a few things that are highlights. There's a statement up front here where it says eligible entities may not categorically exclude any given technology. So suddenly a very broad tent in terms of technology. But then it goes on and and talks about, you know, the, you know some some of the caveats there. And the NTIA reserves the right to reverse an eligible entity's determination that a project does or does not meet the standard, you know, for a priority broadband project, if such determination is unreasonable. So what's interesting is this is actually. A two sided sword. So if you said we're going to include all of these, you know, flavors of technology and, you know, and you included people that were not credible, you know, the NTIA could reverse that. On the other hand, if you were, you know, prescriptive and excluded people that they felt should be included. They could, could reverse that too, but it's a so and then. And then, what else is, is interesting is it also goes on to describe the concept of a non priority broadband project. And this is also interesting because, you know, we've already said that, in theory, all technologies are are welcome but, but there are projects that sort of fail to meet this priority definition, and they're called non priority. Okay, so that's that's interesting. It goes on and talks about the extremely high cost per location threshold, which was part of a critical part of the original NOFO. And the idea is you would deploy fiber up until you hit the dollar threshold there, and then you do other technologies. And then also there's the idea that you know that award stop if a if a project cost is excessive. And within the text of the NOFO they actually cite, you know, Nevada was one of the three that had completed, you know, their sub grantee selection. And they, you know, indicated, you know, an extremely high cost threshold of of 200,000 and so, so they actually call that out as as excessive So, but, but again, that's something that is, is just sort of a judgment call. What technologies are available. You have a fiber cable, Leo, satellite license or unlicensed spectrum or hybrid. And this replaces what was previous, previously a tier, a tiered structure of of fiber, and then other, other, quote, unquote, reliable technologies, and then alternative, so, so this is a some conceptual changes, and this I sort of pulled up in terms of sequence. There's a lot, there's a discussion in appendix, a of unlicensed and basically, even though the technology is allowed, there are certain hurdles that people need to go through if that's if they're doing that, and certain demonstrations they need to make. There's Similarly, similarly a section on Leo satellite rules. And one of the interesting pieces is they talk about low Earth, you know, satellite in terms of capacity sub grants, and, you know, part of the concept is, if you're deploying infrastructure, whether it's fiber or or or wireless, you know, the government can have an interest in that physical hardware that they've deployed with satellite, that's not possible. And so what they do is they, they have a, what they call reserved capacity and a 10 year period of performance. They require them to advertise. Adoption is sort of tied into to the methodology, how they're they're compensated, they need to activate in 10 days, like other technologies, and they're required to pay for the installation of the CPE and for the CPE itself, which which? You know, if you're a fiber provider or any other provider, you often do that, but it's not required.